🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 03 Apr 2003 22:12:06 +0100, Lemming
<l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Bret Ripley <rip...@olywa.net> wrote:
>
>>In article <A4Nia.23982$Hx.14...@twister.socal.rr.com>, bhuffma1
>>@REMOVE-THISsan.rr.com says...
>>> 
>>> "Lemming" <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:igmm8v82tq5ga16pl7haej658j54uuvdmo@4ax.com...
>>> 
>>> > I'm just please they have found all those chemical and biological
>>> > weapons.  Makes the whole thing worthwhile.  What a relief.
>>> 
>>> I'm convinced that they will find some. Why else would the Iraqi army have those
>>> NEW gas masks and chemical suits?
>>
>>For the same reason that the US has NEW gas masks and chemical suits?  
>>
>>Even if Irag doesn't have bio & chem weapons (and I think it rather 
>>probable that they do), there are countries that pose a threat to Iraq 
>>that definitely have them.
>>
>>You know the US has bio & chem weapons, right?
>
>Shurely shome mishtake?
>
>Repeat after me: 
>
>The US does not have ANY biological or chemical weapons.  Period.
>
>The anthrax that was sent around the USA after 11/9 was NOT produced
>in the USA.  Period.
>
>The UK is NOT the world's most prolific producer of germ warfare
>agents.  Period.

All fine points, and no argument from me on the agenda ridden, double
standard standpoint of the coalition.

However, I wonder when the US government will get around to dropping
it's supply of comicals on some of it's northern cities?
Just cos something is wrong doesn't mean something else isn't wronger.

Anyway, you smell and that's and end to it.

br d