🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:32:19 -0700, Bill Huffman wrote:

> "John Secker" <John@secker.demon.co.uk> wrote in message 
> news:bCDjw2ApBOtHFwNn@secker.demon.co.uk...
>> In message <57widpnxgb79.ik7e22ju3psg.dlg@40tude.net>, Bret Ripley 
>> <ripley@gotsky.com> writes
>>>On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:21:36 -0800 (PST), Solstar wrote:
>>>
>>>> as topic said,i just got BC millenium,after playing a lot with
>>>> bc3000.but right now,'i'm seeing UC screenshots...it seems almost
>>>> identical.what's the differences betweeen the two?
>>>
>>>Oops -- sorry, must have dozed off there.
>>>
>>>Hi: I am the last of the keepers of the csipgs-s FAQ. According to section
>>>71.b (revision c.3) of the FAQ, we are not allowed to discuss D*r*k Sm*rt
>>>simulations here. Please submit your query (in triplicate) to any public
>>>utility office or post office for prompt processing.
>>>
>> Hmm -  can't help wondering what a D*r*k Sm*rt simulations would look 
>> like. A random word generator from a dictionary of profanities?
>> -- 
>> John Secker
> 
> You're correct. The amazing technical achievement though, worthy of a Ph.D., 
> was hiding the word generator from the dictionary of profanities within an 
> Excel spreadsheet and applying a seamless graphical interface that contains 
> seams.

Observation: fully 100% of this month's posts consist of Bill Huffman
obsessing over D*r*k Sm*rt. You cyber-stalker, you.

So, Bill, how ya doin'?

Bret