🚀 go-pugleaf

"Bret Ripley" <ripley@gotsky.com> wrote in message 
news:alcy1ofyfqig$.m0uts64bss4v.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:32:19 -0700, Bill Huffman wrote:
>
>> "John Secker" <John@secker.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:bCDjw2ApBOtHFwNn@secker.demon.co.uk...
>>> In message <57widpnxgb79.ik7e22ju3psg.dlg@40tude.net>, Bret Ripley
>>> <ripley@gotsky.com> writes
>>>>On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:21:36 -0800 (PST), Solstar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> as topic said,i just got BC millenium,after playing a lot with
>>>>> bc3000.but right now,'i'm seeing UC screenshots...it seems almost
>>>>> identical.what's the differences betweeen the two?
>>>>
>>>>Oops -- sorry, must have dozed off there.
>>>>
>>>>Hi: I am the last of the keepers of the csipgs-s FAQ. According to 
>>>>section
>>>>71.b (revision c.3) of the FAQ, we are not allowed to discuss D*r*k 
>>>>Sm*rt
>>>>simulations here. Please submit your query (in triplicate) to any public
>>>>utility office or post office for prompt processing.
>>>>
>>> Hmm -  can't help wondering what a D*r*k Sm*rt simulations would look
>>> like. A random word generator from a dictionary of profanities?
>>> -- 
>>> John Secker
>>
>> You're correct. The amazing technical achievement though, worthy of a 
>> Ph.D.,
>> was hiding the word generator from the dictionary of profanities within 
>> an
>> Excel spreadsheet and applying a seamless graphical interface that 
>> contains
>> seams.
>
> Observation: fully 100% of this month's posts consist of Bill Huffman
> obsessing over D*r*k Sm*rt. You cyber-stalker, you.
>
> So, Bill, how ya doin'?

I'm doing most wonderful, thanks. Sorry that I didn't respond sooner but I 
was hoping that I could maybe win some kind of cyber stalking award for two 
months in a row.