🚀 go-pugleaf

Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of
the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs say:

>On Thu, 11 May 2006 17:02:35 +0200, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg, Werner Spahl
>wrote: 
>
>>On Thu, 11 May 2006 gray.wizard@moria.mines wrote:
>>
>>> drop a steel girder directly onto a windshield and it's easily broken.
>>
>>But we are talking about a space ship here where the windshield should
>>survive direct fire and meteorite impacts at high velocities. Which of
>>course it easily did until the script said otherwise. How come the guys
>>were at the right place even before the Serenity too? Watch that crash
>>scene and then tell me they could have overtaken her or were waiting at
>>the place where she would stop. This looks completely illogical to me.
>
>It was, but then again, who the hell would test "PAX" on an entire planet
>before trying it out under more controlled circumstances? Wheedon's no physics
>genius, he's an entertainer.

Controlled circumstances in a lab may not have duplicated the PAX
effects on that planet.
Do recall the bit of info in "The Train Job" that all the terraformed
planets and moons have some kind of gotcha as a result.

PAX + whatever was not right on Miranda = Lie_down_and_Diers/Reavers.

It's not like sort of "we tested in the lab and it's fine" turning out
not so fine later isn't happening now.

Remember when it was a GOOD idea to use asbestos in a home?
Remember when salesmen ATE DDT to show how harmless and safe it was?
Remember watches/phones with Radium in them so they were visible at
night?

Xocyll
-- 
I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr