🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:26:00 GMT, Shingen wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:59:27 -0800, Bret Ripley <ripley@gotsky.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>> I love you Bret :-)
>>
>>Really? Are you sure? 'Cause I was prepared to settle for disinterested
>>lust.
> 
> Hey, wait a minute here..what's wrong with disinterested lust? Someone
> hit the TacOps display so I can get an overview. I'm clueless without
> it. =P

Hmmmmm.....TacOps display......isn't that
Ctrl-Alt-R.Shift-PageDown-ScrollLock-F9?

>>> You are an officially sanctioned, learned at a
>>> distance,  rained on by proxy Englishman.
>>
>>The rain is decidedly not by proxy.
> 
> That is a matter of interpretation. But an entirely different
> conversation.
> 
>>> Don't go changing.
>>
>>Oh, okay.
> 
> Besides Bill, Bret has way too much time on his hands...or in his
> hands?

Time slides through my fingers like bricks through mice.

>>So, did you get your inpherior South American hardware problem sorted?  And
>>have you noticed that "The Cranberries" are actually kind of cool?
> 
> Yeah..They are.. but I can't, for the life of me, think of a single
> song.

Zombie.

> Sabbath? Alice Cooper?

I never gave them much of a listen, to be honest.

> Rush?

Now you're talking.

> How about some old Kiss?

Uh.

How about Pink Floyd?  Led Zeppelin?  The Beatles, The Who, The Doors?
Jimi Hendrix?  Simon & Garfunkel?

>>Bret
> 
> You rock

I do?  In that case, I retract Simon & Garfunkel.

Bret