🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <md61ih$l2u$1...@speranza.aioe.org>, no-spam@never.spam says...
> 
> http://www.gamepur.com/news/18163-insider-fallout-4-announcement-e3-2015-safe-assumption-1110-percent-chance.html
> Its on its way (sometime eventually)
> (\__/)
> (='.'=)
> (")_(")  mouse (Sooo !... Time To Finish FO3 Then ?) 


I already didn't like Fallout 3 particularly well, so this announcement 
is not likely to get me out of my tree.

-P.

Am 04.03.15 um 10:15 schrieb Peter Huebner:
> In article <md61ih$l2u$1...@speranza.aioe.org>, no-spam@never.spam says...
>>
>> http://www.gamepur.com/news/18163-insider-fallout-4-announcement-e3-2015-safe-assumption-1110-percent-chance.html
>> Its on its way (sometime eventually)
>> (\__/)
>> (='.'=)
>> (")_(")  mouse (Sooo !... Time To Finish FO3 Then ?)
>
>
> I already didn't like Fallout 3 particularly well, so this announcement
> is not likely to get me out of my tree.
>
FO3 was ok, it was no real fallout however, in the sense that it lacked 
the over the top humor the first two titles had.
I really should play New Vegas which was done partially by the original 
Fallout devs. I have had it on my Steam list for so long now, never 
really have had time to play it.


Werner

Peter Huebner  <p.w.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I already didn't like Fallout 3 particularly well, so this announcement 
>is not likely to get me out of my tree.

I wouldn't necessarily assume there is even going to be announcement.
Fallout 4 is for some reason it often used as click bait.  Sites have
been writing articles like this since not long after Fallout 3 came out.

					Ross Ridge

-- 
 l/  //	  Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo]  rri...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
-()-/()/  http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/ 
 db  //	  

On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:20:40 +0300, Werner Punz <we...@gmx.at> wrote:

> I really should play New Vegas

New Vegas is the true FO3, they just missed a bit to make it greatest:
combats suck by mechanics, combats suck by graphics/animation.
(Invisible walls suck enormously)

Also before you begin to play it, google for in what order and when play
add-ons, as they totally break game balance in 99% cases, and you will not like it.
(The game is not difficult even on hardest level)


Personally I skipped first two, and exceptionally enjoyed Old World Blues,
and The Gruesome Road (I prefer to call it so :) adds to the plot.

Also stock companions are not allowed in add-ons, but custom NPCs are.
Willow babe followed me everywhere.

Do not try all graphics modes at once - the game is prone to crashes.
Though a mod that adds period propagandistic (and anti-Soviet) songs is
a must.


Most probably New Vegas is the Obsidian's pinnacle.

-- 
Andrew Rybenkov

Am 04.03.15 um 17:35 schrieb Ross Ridge:
> Peter Huebner  <p.w.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I already didn't like Fallout 3 particularly well, so this announcement
>> is not likely to get me out of my tree.
>
> I wouldn't necessarily assume there is even going to be announcement.
> Fallout 4 is for some reason it often used as click bait.  Sites have
> been writing articles like this since not long after Fallout 3 came out.
>
> 					Ross Ridge
>
In the meanwhile, Wasteland 2 will be released for consoles, the PC 
version also will get an overhaul as well (according to the news, a 
traits/perks system and rebalanced fights as well as improved graphics 
due to a move to Unity 5)

I just wonder how they are going to pull off the mouse centric controls 
of WL2 with a controller, this will be a tough task.

Werner

On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 3:20:43 AM UTC-8, Werner Punz wrote:
> Am 04.03.15 um 10:15 schrieb Peter Huebner:
> > In article <md61ih$l2u$1...@speranza.aioe.org>, no-spam@never.spam says...
> >>
> >> http://www.gamepur.com/news/18163-insider-fallout-4-announcement-e3-2015-safe-assumption-1110-percent-chance.html
> >> Its on its way (sometime eventually)
> >> (\__/)
> >> (='.'=)
> >> (")_(")  mouse (Sooo !... Time To Finish FO3 Then ?)
> >
> >
> > I already didn't like Fallout 3 particularly well, so this announcement
> > is not likely to get me out of my tree.
> >
> FO3 was ok, it was no real fallout however, in the sense that it lacked 
> the over the top humor the first two titles had.
> I really should play New Vegas which was done partially by the original 
> Fallout devs. I have had it on my Steam list for so long now, never 
> really have had time to play it.
> 

I found FO3 to be far better than NV after a couple mods.  I also found far more humor in FO3.

- Justisaur