🚀 go-pugleaf

On 12/9/2013 10:46 AM, Garrett wrote:
>
> Downloaded "King's Bounty the Legend" form Steam 2 weeks ago.
> Excellent RPG.
> Have an interface question, about your "Troops."
> The stats shown for a Troop member like "Attack 41 (25)" what is the
> "(25)" indicate?
> The game manual only explains what "Attack" is, not the two sets of
> numbers.

Hmm it's been a while since I played KB but if I remember correctly (25) 
would be the maximum number of damage (in units) you can cause with that 
particular attack.

On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:46:53 +0400, Garrett <tecknode@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> Downloaded "King's Bounty the Legend" form Steam 2 weeks ago.
> Excellent RPG.

Yeah. And Armored Princess is even better.

-- 
Andrew Rybenkov

On 10/12/2013 1:46 AM, Garrett wrote:
>
> Downloaded "King's Bounty the Legend" form Steam 2 weeks ago.
> Excellent RPG.
>
> Have an interface question, about your "Troops."
>
> The stats shown for a Troop member like "Attack 41 (25)" what is the
> "(25)" indicate?
>
> The game manual only explains what "Attack" is, not the two sets of
> numbers.

One number is the base attack of the troop, the other number is the 
actual attack (after applying all the attack bonuses from your hero and 
artifacts etc).

On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:32:48 +1000, Climate Change
<climate...@itsafact.com> wrote:

Q> On 10/12/2013 1:46 AM, Garrett wrote:
Q> >
Q> > Downloaded "King's Bounty the Legend" form Steam 2 weeks ago.
Q> > Excellent RPG.
Q> >
Q> > Have an interface question, about your "Troops."
Q> >
Q> > The stats shown for a Troop member like "Attack 41 (25)" what is the
Q> > "(25)" indicate?
Q> >
Q> > The game manual only explains what "Attack" is, not the two sets of
Q> > numbers.
Q> 
Q> One number is the base attack of the troop, the other number is the 
Q> actual attack (after applying all the attack bonuses from your hero and 
Q> artifacts etc).
Q> 

Are you sure?  The adjusted attack is LOWER than the Troop's base
attack?

If you adjust a Troop's base attack for all the *bonuses* from your
hero shouldn't the attack be higher?

I would have assumed the '41' in the above example is the adjusted
attack and the '(25)' is the base attack.

Anyone else confirm either scenario?


-- 
==== Tecknomage ====
Master Thief
Thieves Guild Master (Oblivion)

On 11/12/2013 1:33 AM, Garrett wrote:
> Q> One number is the base attack of the troop, the other number is the
> Q> actual attack (after applying all the attack bonuses from your hero and
> Q> artifacts etc).
> Q>
>
> Are you sure?  The adjusted attack is LOWER than the Troop's base
> attack?
>
> If you adjust a Troop's base attack for all the *bonuses* from your
> hero shouldn't the attack be higher?
>
> I would have assumed the '41' in the above example is the adjusted
> attack and the '(25)' is the base attack.

That's actually what I meant - I just had it the wrong way around.

On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:49:03 +1000, Climate Change
<climate...@itsafact.com> wrote:

Q> On 11/12/2013 1:33 AM, Garrett wrote:
Q> > Q> One number is the base attack of the troop, the other number is the
Q> > Q> actual attack (after applying all the attack bonuses from your hero and
Q> > Q> artifacts etc).
Q> > Q>
Q> >
Q> > Are you sure?  The adjusted attack is LOWER than the Troop's base
Q> > attack?
Q> >
Q> > If you adjust a Troop's base attack for all the *bonuses* from your
Q> > hero shouldn't the attack be higher?
Q> >
Q> > I would have assumed the '41' in the above example is the adjusted
Q> > attack and the '(25)' is the base attack.
Q> 
Q> That's actually what I meant - I just had it the wrong way around.
Q> 


Thanks for the reply.

-- 
==== Tecknomage ====
Master Thief
Thieves Guild Master (Oblivion)