Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg
Article #720646Re: OT-Monitor question
From: DMP
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:44
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:44
36 lines
3108 bytes
3108 bytes
On 9/22/2014 7:24 PM, Ross Ridge wrote: > DMP <nom...@nodomain.com> wrote: >> FWIW, here's something I found while doing research....I did not know >> there was such a thing as a display port as opposed to HDMI. Nvidia says >> their 600 & 700 will do 4K. > Yes, your video card will work with a 4K monitor. You won't notice > any issues with it when using the Windows desktop, other than the fact > that everything (eg. the text you're reading now) will be almost half > the hieght and width. The problem comes when you try to play a game. > Most games released in the last couple of years should support 3840x2160, > but performance won't be good. Going from 1920x1600 to 3840x2160 means > your video card needs to draw almost 4 times as many pixels, with a > corresponding decrease in performance. The means with many current > games you're going to have to turn down the graphic options to have the > game run at an acceptable frame rate. You'll end up a with a game that > looks worse on your new monitor than your old. > > Note the UHD monitor you're thinking about getting should have come > with a DisplayPort cable when new. If you do end up getting it make > sure you get the cable with it too, otherwise you're going to have to > buy one separately. > > Ross Ridge > Ross-Thanks for an explanation that I could understand. I do remember what an adjustment it was when I gave up my old 4:3 monitor for this one and how I had to fiddle with it so I could at least read stuff. Then there's the gimmicky Samsung 27" 4K with the curved screen due out shortly...;-) D. D.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<lvrbsj$bv9$1@dont-email.me>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!vw1ni14392lbb.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.108.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.130.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<lvptu6$v10$1@dont-email.me> <lvq133$ph7$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca> <lvq57q$j9g$1@dont-email.me> <lvqb2k$h68$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.112.182.8 with SMTP id ea8mr3168lbc.11.1411871856487; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 19:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!vw1ni14392lbb.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.108.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.130.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: DMP <nom...@nodomain.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg Subject: Re: OT-Monitor question Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 04:44:53 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: <lvrbsj$bv9$1@dont-email.me> References: <lvptu6$v10$1@dont-email.me> <lvq133$ph7$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca> <lvq57q$j9g$1@dont-email.me> <lvqb2k$h68$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="feee13a3009245c59fe10e3fe29cdb22"; logging-data="12265"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/c3AN5waw+qbgr3+nrf8wPa0iEc0qwKC4=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 In-Reply-To: <lvqb2k$h68$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca> Cancel-Lock: sha1:6g4Ztm2G0ccJLtxiKvszQba6zAM= Bytes: 2860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit