🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:44:48 GMT, john...@frontier.com (John Lewis)
wrote:

>On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:50:28 -0400, Rin Stowleigh
><rstow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:10:57 GMT, john...@frontier.com (John Lewis)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:49:45 -0400, Rin Stowleigh
>>><rstow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:45:59 GMT, john...@frontier.com (John Lewis)
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Can't you do any better than pull up of that 3-year-old misbegotten
>>>>>marketing stunt again...
>>>>
>>>>I'll take a misbegotten marketing stunt at the rate of once every
>>>>three years in exchange for your misbegotten anti-Steam rants at the
>>>>rate of once every couple of weeks, if I'm given the choice.
>>>>
>>>>How are the meds going?  Doesn't seem like you're getting your moneys
>>>>worth.  Not combining them with paint huffing against doctors orders
>>>>again are ya?
>>>
>>>
>>>Run out of logical arguments again ? Back to the personal insults ?
>>>How sad.  
>>>
>>>Methinks you should killfile me. Then my replies to your postings
>>>would not cause you to waste any more of your valuable time in
>>>creating responses
>>>
>>> I guarantee that my kill-filed replies will not stoop to belittling
>>>insults. However, I might have a little fun with your "screen-name" on
>>>these newsgroups.
>>
>>Is that an official request?  If so, then noted, and I will keep it
>>under consideration.
>>
>>The folks who have been killfiled got where they are because of
>>*intentional* douchebaggery.  I truly believe yours is unintentional,
>>and prescription meds and other issues beyond your control are
>>responsible for a considerable amount of it.  As I've said before, you
>>do have some redeeming things to say when in the rare state of not
>>ranting against Valve, so to be honest you haven't even been in the
>>aiming reticle for a  killfiling.  I actually try to refrain from
>>killfiling people wherever possible, because it can muck up the
>>threads when folks reply to the killfilees.
>>
>>As I've said in the past though, I do accept requests for killfiling
>>and take each one into careful consideration, so if that's what you
>>really want, then your  request has been noted for future review.
>>However if your request is an evasive action to avoid ongoing
>>ball-busting by yours truly, I'm afraid it will be ineffective.  A
>>unilateral killfile job means I will still be able to bust your balls,
>>yet won't have to read your feeble attempts to do same.
>>
>>
>
>Still trying to be the big quack in this little duck-pond ?

You keep your hands off my quawk, perv.