🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg
Article #1053

Re: Problem with Pentium processors

#1053
From: doc... John Sabean
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 1994 21:32
36 lines
2481 bytes
In article <3d1f63$1...@nntp.interaccess.com>, ran...@flowbee.interaccess.com (Brett Neumeier) writes:
>swk...@leonis.nus.sg (Sir Launcelot du Lake) writes:
>
>>Well met Xeen,
>
>> The Codex of Ultimate Wisdom caught Xeen writing:
>>:     The first month that Intel produced the 100 chip in volume was October 
>>: after the bug was fixed.  So these people's claims are untrue.  They are simply
>>: trying to make this bug a bigger deal than it actually is.
>>:     Intel has also been making bug free chips for four months now so there 
>>: should be no doubt as to how many good chips are out there.  Unless a system
>>: manufacturer is seriously lagging behind with their chips you can be assured 
>>: that your new Pentium system you plan to purchase will be problem free.  Make
>
>	Actually, a few weeks ago in InfoWeek there was an article which
>reported that Intel plans to continue shipping buggy chips well into next
>year.  So, in fact, there's no guarantee at this point.

>From all the things I've heard, this is the truth.

They've just barely begun making the chips without the bug.

There is so much misinformation out there on this subject, but the general
consensus I've gotten from people I trust who have been following the
pentium bug saga:

Don't expect any guarentees on a bug free pentium for another 6 months. If any
of these letter writting or petition campaigns are successful (IE Intel offering
free upgrades with no questions asked), don't expect it for another year!


(Just another opinion to confuse everyone :)


My personal advice: If you're worried about the bug, buy a DX4/100 :) 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3d4u51$649@mojo.eng.umd.edu>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.umbc.edu!haven.umd.edu!cs.umd.edu!mojo.eng.umd.edu!docmani
References: <3cjk0n$svj@expert.cc.purdue.edu> <3codle$m3q@nuscc.nus.sg> <3d1f63$1l3@nntp.interaccess.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.umbc.edu!haven.umd.edu!cs.umd.edu!mojo.eng.umd.edu!docmani
From: doc...@eng.umd.edu (John Sabean)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.marketplace
Subject: Re: Problem with Pentium processors
Date: 19 Dec 1994 21:32:17 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Lines: 37
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3d4u51$649@mojo.eng.umd.edu>
References: <3cjk0n$svj@expert.cc.purdue.edu> <3codle$m3q@nuscc.nus.sg> <3d1f63$1l3@nntp.interaccess.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: endeavour.umd.edu
Originator: doc...@endeavour.umd.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit