Thread View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Roderick Stewart
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:34
Advice for newbie?
Author: Roderick Stewart
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:34
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:34
36 lines
3018 bytes
3018 bytes
I have hardly any experience of commercial CD-based PC games, but decided to install a couple on a new computer I've just built for my daughter because I thought her kids might like them. This is where my puzzlement begins. Although both games installed an enormous amount of material on the hard drive, and one even required me to enter a serial number, both of them seem to require that the original discs are in the drive before they will run, and I can't find any way to avoid this. Is this normal? For fear that repeated handling by kids might damage these discs, I tried to make copies, but Nero reported read errors and gave up. Even when the original discs are used, the machine takes a very long time to read them, accompanied by a lot of repetitive clicking noises like the ones you get when a CD drive is faulty. This makes me wonder if they are using an anti-copying strategy whereby the recordings are slightly non-standard but within the range of tolerances that they hope will allow them to be read on most normal drives. I've heard that Playstation discs are like this, hence the sale of little boxes to allow playing of backups made on a standard CD recorder. The machine I used to try to make the copies is a different one from the one with the games, so two different CD drives are apparently struggling with these discs, though they both work just fine with anything else, and both games are by different publishers. There doesn't seem to be any common factor except that both the "difficult" programs are games, hence my request for any advice to deal with them, or simply reasurance that this is quite normal and I'll just have to live with it. Every other program I possess, mostly costing considerably more than these games, will allow me to use them straight from the hard drive once they're installed, so why are the game publishers so paranoid about security, if that's what it is? Rod.
Re: Advice for newbie?
Author: Raymond Martineau
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:02
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:02
25 lines
2258 bytes
2258 bytes
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:34:32 GMT, Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.nospam.plus.com> wrote: >I have hardly any experience of commercial CD-based PC games, but >decided to install a couple on a new computer I've just built for my >daughter because I thought her kids might like them. This is where my >puzzlement begins. > >Although both games installed an enormous amount of material on the >hard drive, and one even required me to enter a serial number, both of >them seem to require that the original discs are in the drive before >they will run, and I can't find any way to avoid this. Is this normal? This is only normal in the sense of being industry standard. Don't be suprised, since the comptuer entertainment industry was known to release a copy-protection for the C64 that would eventually cause your disk drives to run out of alignment. >For fear that repeated handling by kids might damage these discs, I >tried to make copies, but Nero reported read errors and gave up. You need to tell Nero to ignore any read-errors, and let it run for a few hours. However, this won't work as most burners don't write SafeDisc or SecuROM compatable images. You're better off getting a No-CD crack, available at www.gamecopyworld.com.
Re: Advice for newbie?
Author: Roderick Stewart
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:35
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:35
19 lines
2078 bytes
2078 bytes
In article <095i311ssa775ihvlmokjp2lvr3qrgar6c@4ax.com>, Raymond Martineau wrote: > You're better off getting a No-CD crack, > available at www.gamecopyworld.com. Thanks for this advice. I've had a quick look and at least one of the games is listed there. Now I just have to check the version number of the one I've got. It still seems absurd that a game that cost me 10GBP should have copy protection when programs costing many times more do not. Also it is annoying that they should depart from technical standards to do it, because all that will happen is somebody will make non-standard equipment to beat it and eventually that will become the new de facto standard, and in the meantime many people will be confused about things that sometimes work and sometimes don't for no obvious reason. As if technology wasn't confusing enough already. Rod.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads