Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc
Article #83545Re: Best Video card?
From: ar... Arnie
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 1997 00:00
24 lines
1536 bytes
1536 bytes
On Fri, 5 Dec 1997 05:41:53 -0600, "Gregory Cook" <gfox...@rice.edu> wrote: > >STB's Velocity 128 kicks ass, 2-D AND 3-D. > Sorry to piss on your fireworks Greg, but the benchmarks would dispute your statement. With the new 250 MHz RAMDAC the Millennium II certainly 'kicks ass' in 2D - but for 3D, yes, the Velocity wins by a mile (better still, the Number Nine Revolution 3D - 80% faster than the Millennium II for 3D... but for such a high price it should be). Simple rule - if you want 3D performance then stick with OpenGL-based cards if you can afford it, or DirectX-based cards (eg. Velocity 128) if you can't. But for overall Windows performance plus more than just reasonable 3D performance thrown in for good measure, you can't beat the Millennium II at the current low price. A real bargain. BTW - I also made the mistake of buying the 128, so don't feel too bad it... :)) Pete.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<34888082.7094807@news.firstnet.co.uk>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6674em$jo7$1@gte2.gte.net> <668p9u$t7t$1@joe.rice.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: ar...@solid-gold.co.uk (Arnie) Subject: Re: Best Video card? Date: 1997/12/05 Message-ID: <34888082.7094807@news.firstnet.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 295592842 References: <6674em$jo7$1@gte2.gte.net> <668p9u$t7t$1@joe.rice.edu> Organization: Solid Gold Software XPident: Unknown Newsgroups: alt.games,alt.games.daggerfall,alt.games.elder-scrolls,alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.final-fantasy.rpg,alt.irc.games,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,rec.games.computer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit