🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <6dnl13$f...@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>,
  knj...@worldnet.att.net (Nick Jong) wrote:

> >The ORIGINAL topic raised by the original post was about how ONE CAN'T
FINISH KQ6 WITHOUT THE LAMP!!!!!!!  YOU changed the subject, and then focused
on that damn omniscience thing.  I have said MANY that if YOU find it unfair,
that's your perogative.  But that WASN'T even the argument!!!!  So who wasn't
listening?


>>>>>> Let's get this out of the way: I really thought the lamp thing was
necessary, and I was wrong. Period. Matthew is not changing the subject, he's
just giving his opinion, and no one has been able to prove him wrong yet.
Because he isn't. And I still haven't heard of a way around the coin puzzle,
but I might be wrong again. And just because I am admitting my mistake, it
doesn't mean I appreciate RW's work any more now: I still think she is a bad
games designer, and she should stick to running the company (unless it has
been sold, I've heard something of the sort...) and support people like Jane
Jensen (sorry to bring her name again, but that's what talent is all about).
 As for calling RW an imbecile, I wasn't talking about Roberta, the woman; I
wasn't talking about Roberta, the wife, the business woman, the mother (if
that applies). I was calling RW, the games designer, an imbecile. To make my
point clear: Thyago (and that would be me), the driver, is an imbecile. I have
my driver's license, but I recognise I won't be taking my car out in the city
until I'm certain of what I'm doing. I call it responsibility. Still, I'm
sorry I used the word I did, since it apparently offended so many people out
there. Let's just stick to talentless then, because that I won't retract.

                                                                Thyago S. M.

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading