🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure
Article #172562

Re: Roberta Williams is a FRAUD

#172562
From: Raymond Phathanavirangoon
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 00:00
53 lines
2960 bytes


On Tue, 3 Mar 1998 thya...@sol.com.br wrote:
 
> OK, admittedly on eof the reasions why I liked KQ6 so much is because Jane
> Jensen  co-wrote it.  So there.  If you hated KQ6, blame half it  on her too!

Well, if you didn't like it, that's fine by me.

> >>>>>>>> Hmmm... ok. Jensen, lousy job you did there. Gabriel Knight, though,
> heh? Nice way to make up for that.
> 
> 
> Yes.  But to say that she is an imbecile, has no talent, etc,etc, etc is
> VERY demeaning.  Surely you have enjoyed at least ONe of her games?  I mean,
> what has Roberta done to that guy to accept all this slamming?
> 
> >>>>>>>> Yup, you're half-right there. I'm sorry I used the word I did, but
> that doesn't invalidate my point. What did she do? You mean, apart from making
> me waste money? After Phantasmagoria, I learned to buy from stores with return
> policy - and I should thank her for that, or I'd be stuck with Battle Cruiser
> 3000AD until today.

No, I didn't disagree with your point, but I found the TONE of it very
offending.  I started getting into adventue games right after finishing
KQ1 in 1986.  I was so trilled I wanted to get more KQs.  She invariably
had a huge impact on my life, otherwise I wouldn't be trying to work in
the computer gaming industry now! :)  Of course, I've played text games
before KQ, but the graphics blew me away.  

If you didn't like Phantas, you could always return it.  Sierra's had a
30-day money-back gaurantee for a long time.  If you didn't use that
option, it's your loss.  

> 
> Huh?  I'm trying to defend Roberta Williams' position by sayying that she
> DOES have games worth playing.  I'm sure YOU have to agree with that.

> >>>>>>>>> No, I don't have to, and nobody else has to. As much as not everyone
> has to agree with my original post. If you like the woman's work, fine, just
> say so. I won't agree, but I'll respect that.

No, I meant Matthew Murray, not you.  It's obvious you don't like ANY of
her works :).  I guess everyone has different tastes.  But I personally
did not like KQ7, KQ5 now Phantas either.  
 
> 
> 
> -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
> http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
> 
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.980303211626.14483C-100000@monet.artisan.calpoly.edu>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <6db79d$gks$1@nnrp2.dejanews.com> <34FA7F09.E723B71B@polymail.calpoly.edu> <Pine.SOL.3.96.980302071206.3899F-100000@titan.cc.wwu.edu> <34FB9FC6.ACF24364@polymail.calpoly.edu> <6dhi3i$jrs$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Raymond  Phathanavirangoon <rpha...@polymail.calpoly.edu>
Subject: Re: Roberta Williams is a FRAUD
Date: 1998/03/03
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.980303211626.14483C-100000@monet.artisan.calpoly.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 330649722
References: <6db79d$gks$1@nnrp2.dejanews.com> <34FA7F09.E723B71B@polymail.calpoly.edu> <Pine.SOL.3.96.980302071206.3899F-100000@titan.cc.wwu.edu> <34FB9FC6.ACF24364@polymail.calpoly.edu> <6dhi3i$jrs$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Sender: rpha...@monet.artisan.calpoly.edu
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit