🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3vkgau$m...@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>, x...@ix.netcom.com (Ken)
writes:
>
> Msg-ID: <3vkgau$m...@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
> References: <barryn.8...@BIX.com>
> Posted: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 09:12:13 GMT
>
> Org.  : Xanadu Enterprises Inc.
>
> bar...@BIX.com (barryn on BIX) wrote:
>
> >Heh. Let me tell *you* the story: I gave one of my sons a 486/33, the
> >Win9x beta, and Flight Simulator 5.0. Win9x installed slowly and with
> >some difficulty (ScanDisk is awful). About five seconds into Flight
> >Simulator (in a DOS full screen session), Win9x popped up a dialog
> >box that said Win9x couldn't run FS in a session. My son and I ripped
> >Win9x off the PC (with some difficulty!) and installed Warp. Warp runs
> >FS in a full screen session just fine.
>
>
>         Well, since by most accounts FS runs fine, then you have a
> hardware
> problem. Odd that Warp runs on it since warp is MUCH more picky.


Well, what did you expect, this guy is obviousely biased toward's OS/2. Why
people cant be objective and not be biased with OS's is beyond me :-) If
you like OS/2, then fine, use it. If you like WIN95, then use it :-) HELL
if you even like DOS then use it <g>

Ttul