Re: Windows 95 /NT MicroCenters dropped the ball

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #1003

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#1003

From: pvan... Pim van Meurs
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 1995 00:00

24 lines
1539 bytes

In article <3ulr1e$3...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> jmarc...@aol.com (JMarc39157) writes:
>then maybe OS/2 will look good but not now!  BTW, you claim that WinNT
>isn't good for most people because of the steep hardware reqs...  OS/2
>requires just about the
>same amount... I wouldn't dare run it on under 16 Megs of RAM.  

Well, that serves to show that you probably have  not used OS/2 in
less than 16 Mbytes. I am running a 386/33Mhz and 8 MBytes of RAM
and the response is good. Of course when I try to run AMIPRO it will
swap like hell but even with the networking on, it works very good.

OS/2 runs well in 8 Mbytes, what about NT ?

Pim
>John

-- 
Pim van Meurs  UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Mail Code A-030  	" The Future is not what it used to be"
UCSD La Jolla  CA 92093                      p...@nepac.ucsd.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <85975@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3ufh8m$6e3@elysium.clare.tased.edu.au> <3ulr1e$37n@newsbf02.news.aol.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: pvan...@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Pim van Meurs)
Subject: Re: Windows 95 /NT MicroCenters dropped the ball
Date: 1995/07/21
Message-ID: <85975@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 106579307
sender: ne...@sdcc12.ucsd.edu
references: <3ufh8m$6e3@elysium.clare.tased.edu.au> <3ulr1e$37n@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
followup-to: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
organization: University of California, San Diego
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message