🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3tnn0r$f...@lynx.unm.edu> deh...@mirac.unm.edu writes:

 > : right!!!!    OS/2 needs as much hardware behind it as NT any day.   NT, with  > : '95's shell, it's out in beta, will kick OS/2's butt.   Period.
 > 
 > Only if (a big if) MS upgrades NT's lousy Dos emulation (for the record, 
 > NT cannot run Dos Doom as it is, though it supposedly can run win32 Doom, 
 > although it has not been released yet.  Pitiful really, it still being 
 > unreleased over a year after the original was released, and after it has 
 > lost its appeal to most [the same goes for the OS/2 version])

 True! An OS that cannot DOS Doom is total crap!! It is really pitiful to
 buy a supposedly state-of-the-art OS and find out later that it cannot
 run one of the most popular games in the world! I wouldn't want it even
 if it is given to me free along with U$1000.00 as incentive!!! BTW, I
 heard OS/2 cannot run DOS Doom too.

 Wait! May be it is completely ID's fault who intentionally screw up
 the code so that it cannot run on a state-of-the-art OS. Hey! May be
 it is this "Doom ain't done until NT and another OS won't run"
 conspiracy that I keep hearing about!

--
Email : hkc...@hkchan.pc.my