🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <42t6uh$s...@access1.digex.net>,
Robear <rob...@access1.digex.net> wrote:
>In article <42rs9f$l...@dingo.cc.uq.oz.au>,
>Andrae Muys <a.m...@mailbox.uq.oz.au> wrote:
>
>>Anyway from experience's associates have had with the dreaded Win95
>>its implementation of DOS is severly flawed. (just try modifying your
>>system files for one 'feature').  Personally I'll stick with
>>3.xx/Linux and if I need 32-bit Windows I'll go to either WINE,
>>DOSemu, or NT.
>
>>Andrae Muys
>
>I've run about 30 DOS games, some of them fairly picky about setup, under
>W95.  Its' DOS seems flawless.  Care to tell us how it is flawed?  I'd
>like to know what to avoid, and right now, everything I've tried works.
>
>David Pipes

How about the sound support?  I have a GUS and an original SB and can't
get *either* of them to work...The GUS drivers for win3.1 don't work for
95, and the soundblaster I can't a squeak or anything out of ;)  THe games
actualy seem okay, i ran warcraft and MOM to name just two under 95, but
without any sort of sound it is disappointing (sound, voice, or music, 
that is!)

-ROb