🚀 go-pugleaf

>
>The problem for you is that os/2 is dead.  The fact that you try to
>convince youself and others that os/2 is has a future does not change
>this fact.  You don't like Microsoft.  Tough shit pal.  You are a
>miniscule speck and your struggle to be an OS rebel (team os/2 haha)
>will not be a sufficient substitute for the abuse and neglect you must
>have faced as a child.  Os/2 failed miserably as a 32-bit os solution
>for the end-user, for a variety of reasons which are not important.
>The fact is, currently Windows95 is THE solution for the average
>end-user, especially those who spend a lot of time on networks.
>




....You are right, but, so is he. OS/2 is a better multi-tasker than
Windows 95, but thanks to Microsofts stranglehold, it will be the future
of operating systems. In the long run, Windows will catch up, and there's
good things about windows...no operating system is worth as much if there
aren't solid native apps..but, its too bad IBM didn't do a better job
on the installation procedure and user support for OS/2, because the fact
is its a better multi-tasker.



...As for that child shit....grow up guy.




-- 
- Parker
pp00...@interramp.com