🚀 go-pugleaf

Allen Clarke <a...@mround.bt.co.uk> wrote:

*****SNIP****
>Win'95 is much better than Win3.1/WFWG in all respects, its more stable,
>more compatible and a site easier to navigate, plus it still allows you
>to run all your old DOS apps as well.


well, actually i only wanna add one thing to this last bit here, from what
i have heard of the few "beta-testers" of win95 that I know.....
yes, it does allow you to run old dos apps, but.....yep, always the big but
in the way.....that it allows ya to run most things WHEN and only
when ya get the thing installed correctly....in fact most of the magazines
are also telling of a cupl of their "beta-people" having BIG trouble on
installation of this new os....the comments range from midly-amusing to
try to set it up correctly to being a nightmare to even get the most
simple things set-up right....granted these are only a handful, but when
this new os hits the shelves......it will grow to be a bit more than a
small handful when joe blow who knows nothing about his computer
except how to turn it on, start win3.1 or win3.11 and pull up his
wordperfect or whatever else applications he may use, tries to install
an os that is a bit more stressfull to try and install......

l8r
MacDeath
and the pale horse kicks ass, too....