Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #1909Re: Win'95(or '96) IS A FUCKING JOKE!!!
From: big... BigBear
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 00:00
93 lines
3501 bytes
3501 bytes
In <804113...@the-zoo.demon.co.uk> Simon Heyward <Si...@the-zoo.demon.co.uk> writes: > >In article <3skhek$e...@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> > big_...@ix.netcom.com "Big_Bear " writes: > >> In <3sj9kt$c...@lynx.unm.edu> deh...@pegasus.unm.edu (Dan Ehrig) writes: >> >> > >> >JORDAN SPENSER AARON (jord...@benji.Colorado.EDU) wrote: >> > >> > >> >: I agree, the OStwo zealots clammor about how customizable their OS >> is, >> >: but it still looks like shit. Windows 95 could be completely >> > >> >You claim to have never used OS/2, but also claim it looks like shit? >> >> >You have led us to a multiple choice test: >> > >> >A. You're Stupid. >> >B. You're Lying. >> >C. You can't remember if you've used OS/2. >> >D. You can't remember if you're stupid and lying. >> >E. All of the above. >> > >> >I choose E. >> > >> >: uncustomizable and it would still destroy OStwo. Yes, Microsoft has >> >> >: their act together and the OStwo zealots are scurring about like >> Sadam >> >: Hussein spreading untrue propoganda to try to fool us into using >> their >> >: OS. Well they are the fools. >> > >> >Who's the fool, he who tests all the options and chooses the best one, >> or he >> >who blindly commits to using an 'OS' (note that WinXX is not really an >> OS, >> >as it is, once again, a shell on top of Dos) without checking out the >> >competition? >> > >> >Note: As if trying to prove my point, MS is including memmaker.exe >> with >> >the release of Win9X. >> > >> >-Dan >> > >> >-- >> >My inner child is a mean little fucker. >> >http://www.unm.edu/~dehrig/dan3.html >> >> I say that both have FUCKING lost it!!! Everyone know that OS/2 will >> and can KICK THE SHIT OUT OF WINDOWS AND DAY, MONTH, OR YEARS TO COME. >> When Windows decides to make sure that they come close to what OS/2 has >> to offer. (THEN THEY CAN COMPETE IN THAT RACE) But not before!!! I >> don't care when it comes out!! >> >> Big_...@ix.netcom.com >> >> > >Not like windows then ? I had a go at os but when it got a shit on with my >cd drive I got rid. At least windows works on my system well some of the >time ! >-- >Nomis > Well so did I. I had a go at OS/2 WARP my computer class of a month and a half. It worked all the time and never had any problems. On other hand, I have had Windows 3.1 for my computer for 6 year and it SUCK. It messes up all the time. Plus Windows 3.1 was free with the computer and the network program that I use has to run in Windows and doesn't work in the OS/2's window area. That is one of those program that go into that 5% area that OS/2 can't run. Besides if someone gave me Win95 I might think of using it. I would never buy the FUCKING program. BIG BEAR
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3sleni$jkf@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3shdoq$pbg@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <3shrtd$p8p@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3sidc2$11c@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <3sj9kt$crc@lynx.unm.edu> <3skhek$e7n@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> <804113713snz@the-zoo.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: big_...@ix.netcom.com (Big_Bear ) Subject: Re: Win'95(or '96) IS A FUCKING JOKE!!! Date: 1995/06/26 Message-ID: <3sleni$jkf@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 105042012 distribution: world references: <3shdoq$pbg@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <3shrtd$p8p@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3sidc2$11c@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <3sj9kt$crc@lynx.unm.edu> <3skhek$e7n@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> <804113713snz@the-zoo.demon.co.uk> organization: Netcom newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.f MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit