🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #1909

Re: Win'95(or '96) IS A FUCKING JOKE!!!

#1909
From: big... BigBear
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 00:00
93 lines
3501 bytes
In <804113...@the-zoo.demon.co.uk> Simon Heyward
<Si...@the-zoo.demon.co.uk> writes: 
>
>In article <3skhek$e...@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
>           big_...@ix.netcom.com "Big_Bear " writes:
>
>> In <3sj9kt$c...@lynx.unm.edu> deh...@pegasus.unm.edu (Dan Ehrig)
writes:
>> 
>> >
>> >JORDAN  SPENSER AARON (jord...@benji.Colorado.EDU) wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >: I agree, the OStwo zealots clammor about how customizable their
OS
>> is, 
>> >: but it still looks like shit.  Windows 95 could be completely 
>> >
>> >You claim to have never used OS/2, but also claim it looks like
shit? 
>> 
>> >You have led us to a multiple choice test:
>> >
>> >A.  You're Stupid.
>> >B.  You're Lying.
>> >C.  You can't remember if you've used OS/2.
>> >D.  You can't remember if you're stupid and lying.
>> >E.  All of the above.
>> >
>> >I choose E.
>> >
>> >: uncustomizable and it would still destroy OStwo.  Yes, Microsoft
has
>> 
>> >: their act together and the OStwo zealots are scurring about like
>> Sadam 
>> >: Hussein spreading untrue propoganda to try to fool us into using
>> their 
>> >: OS.  Well they are the fools.
>> >
>> >Who's the fool, he who tests all the options and chooses the best
one,
>> or he 
>> >who blindly commits to using an 'OS' (note that WinXX is not really
an
>> OS, 
>> >as it is, once again, a shell on top of Dos) without checking out
the 
>> >competition?
>> >
>> >Note:  As if trying to prove my point, MS is including memmaker.exe
>> with 
>> >the release of Win9X.  
>> >
>> >-Dan
>> >
>> >--
>> >My inner child is a mean little fucker.
>> >http://www.unm.edu/~dehrig/dan3.html
>> 
>> I say that both have FUCKING lost it!!!  Everyone know that OS/2
will
>> and can KICK THE SHIT OUT OF WINDOWS AND DAY, MONTH, OR YEARS TO
COME. 
>> When Windows decides to make sure that they come close to what OS/2
has
>> to offer. (THEN THEY CAN COMPETE IN THAT RACE) But not before!!! I
>> don't care when it comes out!!
>> 
>> Big_...@ix.netcom.com
>> 
>> 
>
>Not like windows then ? I had a go at os but when it got a shit on
with my
>cd drive I got rid. At least windows works on my system well some of
the
>time !
>-- 
>Nomis
>

Well so did I.  I had a go at OS/2 WARP my computer class of a month
and a half.  It worked all the time and never had any problems.  On
other hand, I have had Windows 3.1 for my computer for 6 year and it
SUCK.  It messes up all the time.  Plus Windows 3.1 was free with the
computer and the network program that I use has to run in Windows and
doesn't work in the OS/2's window area.  That is one of those program
that go into that 5% area that OS/2 can't run.  Besides if someone gave
me Win95 I might think of using it.  I would never buy the FUCKING
program.

BIG BEAR
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3sleni$jkf@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3shdoq$pbg@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <3shrtd$p8p@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3sidc2$11c@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <3sj9kt$crc@lynx.unm.edu> <3skhek$e7n@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> <804113713snz@the-zoo.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: big_...@ix.netcom.com (Big_Bear )
Subject: Re: Win'95(or '96) IS A FUCKING JOKE!!!
Date: 1995/06/26
Message-ID: <3sleni$jkf@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 105042012
distribution: world
references: <3shdoq$pbg@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <3shrtd$p8p@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3sidc2$11c@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <3sj9kt$crc@lynx.unm.edu> <3skhek$e7n@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> <804113713snz@the-zoo.demon.co.uk>
organization: Netcom
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit