🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3ubfk1$b8_...@jabba.cybernetics.net>,
Dale Ross <dale...@cybernetics.net> wrote:
>

...

>No Rob, not 'nuff said. You are clueless on what Plus! is. Plus is not a bug 

"you are clueless on xxxxx"

>fix for Windows 95. This does not qualify as FUD, it is down right not true. 
                                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Is this what Team OS/2 has been teaching  you, to not tell the truth? To make 

>things up that sound bad against Windows 95? You are yet another Team OS/2 
>member out spreading untruths.

Once again we have Dale Ross

a)  telling somebody that he disagrees with that they are clueless, or don't
	know what they are talking about, simply because they disagree with
	Dale Ross.

b)  The same old smear job of Team OS/2 :
	"you don't spout the MS company religion therefor you are a liar".
	"you advocate OS/2 therefor you are a Team OS/2 fanatic"
	"you are a liar and and a Team OS/2 Fanatic therefor Team OS/2 is a"
        "bunch of liars."

c) Dale Ross sets himself up as THE judge of what it true and is not, uses
	every last synonym for "lie" and "liar" that he can find, but doesn't
	have the nerve to use "lie" or "liar".

First we had :
	"OS/2 is dead"
Then it was :
	"OS/2 is a niche OS"
Then it was :
	"Win95 will sweep OS/2 before it. ( like NT was supposed to )"
Now it is :
	"Team OS/2 is ....."

Must be something worrying these people that they need to spend the effort
to smear Team OS/2.  A trivial group they could just laugh off.

Bob