Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #944Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-)
From: rob... Robert Miller
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 00:00
24 lines
1421 bytes
1421 bytes
In <1995Jul11.200119@cantva> for...@csc.canterbury.ac.nz writes: > >> : >> releasing a bug free, stable product. Windows 3.1 was more stable than >> : >> OS/2 2.1. > >Pure FUD. > >I used both at the time, and OS/2 was far better. W 3.1 was forever generating >global protection faults. > >Regards, >Euan Obviously you gave WIN3.1 a good look... thats GENERAL PROTECTION FAULTS ... NOT .. GLOBAL PROTECTION FAULTS! -- +--------------------------------+ | Rob Miller | | Bloomfield, CT | | rob...@ix.netcom.com | +--------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3tv1q9$9ft@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3t99np$74c@onramp.arc.nasa.gov> <3t9e83$f4q@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3t9oft$85n@onramp.arc.nasa.gov> <DB84JC.4nq@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <3tf6g5$atg@seymour.sfu.ca> <3tg4mr$hia@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com> <1995Jul11.200119@cantva>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: rob...@ix.netcom.com (Robert Miller ) Subject: Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-) Date: 1995/07/11 Message-ID: <3tv1q9$9ft@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 105992854 distribution: world references: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3t99np$74c@onramp.arc.nasa.gov> <3t9e83$f4q@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3t9oft$85n@onramp.arc.nasa.gov> <DB84JC.4nq@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <3tf6g5$atg@seymour.sfu.ca> <3tg4mr$hia@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com> <1995Jul11.200119@cantva> organization: Netcom newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit