Re: Win95 and games: good news...

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #80

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#80

From: c... Lord Soth
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 00:00

14 lines
1305 bytes

Mark Bassett <mb...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:

>Your good for a laugh!! OS/2 is much faster than Win95 will ever be.
>Just compare Doom for Windows and Doom/2. Yes win95 has DOS
>compatability, but so does OS/2. PC Gamer even said that OS/2 might be a
>better choice for running DOS games. Galactic Civlilizations anyone??

GalCiv is good.  I'll even say that it is great.  However, one game does
not make an operating system great.  Any other good games for OS/2?

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Lord Soth <c...@aimnet.com>  ftp://ftp.aimnet.com/pub/users/lordsoth        |
| Check out my ftp directories for X-Wing and TIE Fighter stuff!             |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------------/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3n1nld$kui@aimnet1.aimnet.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<3mtquj$hq2@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <3mu3la$5rd@news.dgsys.com> <3mudgi$i32@taco.cc.ncsu.edu>  <3muf9d$13u@agate.berkeley.edu> <sjYhE4C00YUJI9lARc@andrew.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: c...@aimnet.com (Lord Soth)
Subject: Re: Win95 and games: good news...
Date: 1995/04/19
Message-ID: <3n1nld$kui@aimnet1.aimnet.com>
X-Deja-AN: 101089352
references: <3mtquj$hq2@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <3mu3la$5rd@news.dgsys.com> <3mudgi$i32@taco.cc.ncsu.edu>  <3muf9d$13u@agate.berkeley.edu> <sjYhE4C00YUJI9lARc@andrew.cmu.edu>
organization: Castle Ravenloft
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message