Re: 32bit MultiTasking OS WHY?!

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #7462

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#7462

From: ia... Ian Kennedy
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00

15 lines
800 bytes

s460...@neptune.np.ac.sg (Chia Soon) wrote:
>Why can't we have a 32bit single tasking OS :(

This is a troll right?

As an Amiga user and a PC/win95 user I can only say that
preemptive multitasking kicks ass. 

I use my machine for more than games, thus multitasking serves a
purpose as it allows me to do many things at once.

like run a compile while I respond to this silly post.

later,
Ian.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <44hd2g$pd1@news2100.microsoft.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4461q2$lgb@neptune.np.ac.sg>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: ia...@microsoft.com (Ian Kennedy)
Subject: Re: 32bit MultiTasking OS WHY?!
Date: 1995/09/29
Message-ID: <44hd2g$pd1@news2100.microsoft.com>
X-Deja-AN: 116801982
references: <4461q2$lgb@neptune.np.ac.sg>
organization: Microsoft Corporation
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message