Re: Which 3D accelerator card to get: Diamond or Creative Lab?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #7292

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#7292

From: pa... Paul Lush
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00

14 lines
1275 bytes

In <442s49$g...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> john...@aol.com (JohnDonld) writes:
>Sure, Nvidia is using a cheat to get around rendering polygons.  The card
>is meant to be a low cost game board!  Creative's board cost more but you
>are also geting over 2x the polygon performance.  You get what you pay
>for.  Creative's board offers the best performance and also has the most
>support!  Creative made over $1.2 Billion last year and they will not
>offer you inferior technology.  

Seem the Modem Blaster - that was inferior as you could get.

>If you want a Saturn go out and buy one.  The Nvidia is not a substitute! 
>Sega is NOT making all it's games for the Nvidia.  I have a Playstation
>and it is far better than the Nvidia.  The 3D Blaster has 2x the
>performance than the Playstation.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <usAbwABMBh107h@clandcen.co.nz>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <442h5n$84n@epx.cis.umn.edu> <442s49$g3k@newsbf02.news.aol.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: pa...@clandcen.co.nz (Paul Lush)
Subject: Re: Which 3D accelerator card to get: Diamond or Creative Lab?
Date: 1995/09/29
Message-ID: <usAbwABMBh107h@clandcen.co.nz>
X-Deja-AN: 110917138
references: <442h5n$84n@epx.cis.umn.edu> <442s49$g3k@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
organization: ComputerLand Central, Palmerston North, NZ
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message