🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #696563

Re: What Have You Been Playing... IN AUGUST 2016?

#696563
From: Justisaur
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:44
78 lines
5826 bytes
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

>
> * The Witcher 1 (replay)
> I /really/ want to replay the third game of the series, but I've set
> myself the goal of playing through the first two games first that I
> might experience the totality of the entire saga (one of my issues
> with my first play-through of the Witcher 3 was that I'd forgotten
> much of the plot of Witcher 1 & 2. Unfortunately, neither of those
> games were particular favorites of mine. Nonetheless, like a child
> promised ice cream if he just finishes his Brussels sprouts, I
> earnestly attempted to work my way through the older titles.
>
> Not that I truly disliked the first Witcher; in many ways, it felt
> like a breath of fresh air when it was released in 2007. In an era
> when Bioware-style RPGs dominated, its grey-on-grey morality and
> meaningful choices were a refreshing change, and the scope of the game
> is still impressive today. While many RPGs have you determine the fate
> of a kingdom, few offered the same feeling of being able to determine
> its soul as you navigated the treacherous political and
> racially-charged waters of a nation on the brink of civil war and
> genocide. Unfortunately, the gameplay itself was not as well-polished.
>
> The actual mechanics - while somewhat clunky - were acceptable; I got
> to enjoy the combat - with its dependency on properly-timed
> mouse-clicks- after a while just because watching the protagonist leap
> and dance about as he slaughtered monsters was so much fun. The
> alchemy - source of the hero's powers - was less fun, just because the
> character's inventory was so small. An infinite stash was available to
> hold the excess, but it was always so tedious to get to - usually four
> or five loading screens and an annoying conversation away - that it
> was frustrating to use. The maps were gorgeously rendered and
> impressively sized - especially in comparison to many of the Witcher's
> competitors of the time - but the game overstayed its welcome far too
> long before opening up the next region. The swamp - where probably
> half of the quests take place - very quickly became tedious.
>
> Worse, the story just couldn't support its own plot, with characters
> and events being haphazardly introduced, then ignored for an act or
> two, only to suddenly have relevance 20 or 30 hours of gameplay later.
> This becomes much more noticeable in the late game, when I was thrust
> into the political intrigue and realized I had no idea who most of the
> people were, what their factions represented, or why I should care one
> way or the other. There is a lot of useful detail provided in in-game
> books and glossaries, but I found these dry and - thanks to the tiny
> font - painful reading. There's a clever and mature tale buried in the
> game but it does little to make it accessible to the player.
>
> Still, while playing The Witcher was often a tedious slog, it was
> generally a rewarding one. Despite its age, the game was still fairly
> good looking and it is still a more adult adventure than most CRPGs on
> the market today (and not just because of the sophomoric sex scenes).
> It just takes a lot more effort.

Witcher is one of those game I should like but don't, much like PS:T. 
It's also one of the few (perhaps only?) games I gave up on returned to 
later and actually finished, unlike PS:T which I never could get 
through.  The gameplay I just found unforgivably bad, extremely poor 
combat, MMO style crafting-grind, and walls of text of 'history' etc. as 
written by wannabe poor writers.

So #3 is better?  Is it worth checking out considering my gripes with 
#1, should I skip #2?  I never played #2 as #1 just wasn't for me and I 
had no desire to repeat the process.

> --------------------
> And that's how I wasted an August, rather than visiting the beach or
> hiking or kayaking like I really wanted to do instead. What about you?

Sounds like you didn't play anything really enjoyable.  Better luck in 
September!

>
> What Have You Been Playing... IN AUGUST 2016?

Um.  *looks sideways* *mumble mumble* look over there \/

- Justisaur
Technical Details
Message-ID: <nqc38s$uhp$1@dont-email.me>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!w143ni1159itb.0!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!enother.net!enother.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <ehcisbl43co97bts7jc1nq80kuugtht4a2@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.13.203.68 with SMTP id n65mr17220235ywd.26.1472827485704;        Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.157.29.207 with SMTP id w15ls9852011otw.10.gmail; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.6.11 with SMTP id 11mr17776225otn.7.1472827484916;        Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!w143ni1159itb.0!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!enother.net!enother.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Justisaur <just...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: What Have You Been Playing... IN AUGUST 2016?
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:44:43 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 78
Message-ID: <nqc38s$uhp$1@dont-email.me>
References: <ehcisbl43co97bts7jc1nq80kuugtht4a2@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:44:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ebee2bc9547f9e4cba0252db2e52dae3"; logging-data="31289"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++sf5KOz6sMx4HNbxcnm7NrKZa35pckLs="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40
In-Reply-To: <ehcisbl43co97bts7jc1nq80kuugtht4a2@4ax.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GWgOT1TkNkttOn6XsDkY9GXWk3M=
X-Received-Bytes: 5329
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2910695570
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit