Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #696563Re: What Have You Been Playing... IN AUGUST 2016?
From: Justisaur
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:44
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:44
78 lines
5826 bytes
5826 bytes
Spalls Hurgenson wrote: > > * The Witcher 1 (replay) > I /really/ want to replay the third game of the series, but I've set > myself the goal of playing through the first two games first that I > might experience the totality of the entire saga (one of my issues > with my first play-through of the Witcher 3 was that I'd forgotten > much of the plot of Witcher 1 & 2. Unfortunately, neither of those > games were particular favorites of mine. Nonetheless, like a child > promised ice cream if he just finishes his Brussels sprouts, I > earnestly attempted to work my way through the older titles. > > Not that I truly disliked the first Witcher; in many ways, it felt > like a breath of fresh air when it was released in 2007. In an era > when Bioware-style RPGs dominated, its grey-on-grey morality and > meaningful choices were a refreshing change, and the scope of the game > is still impressive today. While many RPGs have you determine the fate > of a kingdom, few offered the same feeling of being able to determine > its soul as you navigated the treacherous political and > racially-charged waters of a nation on the brink of civil war and > genocide. Unfortunately, the gameplay itself was not as well-polished. > > The actual mechanics - while somewhat clunky - were acceptable; I got > to enjoy the combat - with its dependency on properly-timed > mouse-clicks- after a while just because watching the protagonist leap > and dance about as he slaughtered monsters was so much fun. The > alchemy - source of the hero's powers - was less fun, just because the > character's inventory was so small. An infinite stash was available to > hold the excess, but it was always so tedious to get to - usually four > or five loading screens and an annoying conversation away - that it > was frustrating to use. The maps were gorgeously rendered and > impressively sized - especially in comparison to many of the Witcher's > competitors of the time - but the game overstayed its welcome far too > long before opening up the next region. The swamp - where probably > half of the quests take place - very quickly became tedious. > > Worse, the story just couldn't support its own plot, with characters > and events being haphazardly introduced, then ignored for an act or > two, only to suddenly have relevance 20 or 30 hours of gameplay later. > This becomes much more noticeable in the late game, when I was thrust > into the political intrigue and realized I had no idea who most of the > people were, what their factions represented, or why I should care one > way or the other. There is a lot of useful detail provided in in-game > books and glossaries, but I found these dry and - thanks to the tiny > font - painful reading. There's a clever and mature tale buried in the > game but it does little to make it accessible to the player. > > Still, while playing The Witcher was often a tedious slog, it was > generally a rewarding one. Despite its age, the game was still fairly > good looking and it is still a more adult adventure than most CRPGs on > the market today (and not just because of the sophomoric sex scenes). > It just takes a lot more effort. Witcher is one of those game I should like but don't, much like PS:T. It's also one of the few (perhaps only?) games I gave up on returned to later and actually finished, unlike PS:T which I never could get through. The gameplay I just found unforgivably bad, extremely poor combat, MMO style crafting-grind, and walls of text of 'history' etc. as written by wannabe poor writers. So #3 is better? Is it worth checking out considering my gripes with #1, should I skip #2? I never played #2 as #1 just wasn't for me and I had no desire to repeat the process. > -------------------- > And that's how I wasted an August, rather than visiting the beach or > hiking or kayaking like I really wanted to do instead. What about you? Sounds like you didn't play anything really enjoyable. Better luck in September! > > What Have You Been Playing... IN AUGUST 2016? Um. *looks sideways* *mumble mumble* look over there \/ - Justisaur
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<nqc38s$uhp$1@dont-email.me>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!w143ni1159itb.0!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!enother.net!enother.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<ehcisbl43co97bts7jc1nq80kuugtht4a2@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.13.203.68 with SMTP id n65mr17220235ywd.26.1472827485704; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:44:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.29.207 with SMTP id w15ls9852011otw.10.gmail; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.6.11 with SMTP id 11mr17776225otn.7.1472827484916; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!w143ni1159itb.0!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!enother.net!enother.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Justisaur <just...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: What Have You Been Playing... IN AUGUST 2016? Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:44:43 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 78 Message-ID: <nqc38s$uhp$1@dont-email.me> References: <ehcisbl43co97bts7jc1nq80kuugtht4a2@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:44:44 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ebee2bc9547f9e4cba0252db2e52dae3"; logging-data="31289"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++sf5KOz6sMx4HNbxcnm7NrKZa35pckLs=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 In-Reply-To: <ehcisbl43co97bts7jc1nq80kuugtht4a2@4ax.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:GWgOT1TkNkttOn6XsDkY9GXWk3M= X-Received-Bytes: 5329 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2910695570 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit