Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #68Re: Win95 and games: good news...
From: Fulcrum Brown
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 1995 00:00
26 lines
1426 bytes
1426 bytes
Oh yeah, it has to be true. I read it in PC Gamer. They're the definitive source of all things true!!!! (If you couldn't figure it, that was sarcasm) sorry, just couldn't help myself. Fulcrum Brown University of Washington On Mon, 17 Apr 1995, Mark Bassett wrote: > Excerpts from netnews.comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim: 17-Apr-95 Re: > Win95 and games: good n.. by Derek Suzuki@ocf.berkele > > >OS/2 is dead, I have seen the future. It is Win95 (yes, I am using it > > >right now). Its even about 5 times faster than OS/2 as well. > > Your good for a laugh!! OS/2 is much faster than Win95 will ever be. > Just compare Doom for Windows and Doom/2. Yes win95 has DOS > compatability, but so does OS/2. PC Gamer even said that OS/2 might be a > better choice for running DOS games. Galactic Civlilizations anyone?? > > Mark > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.OSF.3.91i.950417145238.4256A-100000@saul3.u.washington.edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3mtquj$hq2@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <3mu3la$5rd@news.dgsys.com> <3mudgi$i32@taco.cc.ncsu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Fulcrum Brown <ful...@u.washington.edu> Subject: Re: Win95 and games: good news... Date: 1995/04/17 Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91i.950417145238.4256A-100000@saul3.u.washington.edu> X-Deja-AN: 101089229 references: <3mtquj$hq2@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <3mu3la$5rd@news.dgsys.com> <3mudgi$i32@taco.cc.ncsu.edu> organization: University of Washington mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit