Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #6423Re: MW2 Patches released?
From: wran... Steve Cagigas
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00
21 lines
1528 bytes
1528 bytes
In article <44a2g7$2...@allnews.infi.net>, mu...@infi.net says: > >> >Why does it suck? Don't Activision and FASA have the right to maintain >> >exclusivity of their intellectual property if they choose to? They and >> >their staffs did spend a lot of time, energy, money, and creative juice on >> >this game. They've already announced their intention to market add-ons >> >that include new campaigns, new mechs and weapons, and a mission builder. >> >Why does it suck that they get to do this instead of you? > >Who said Activision is going to build a MECH BUILDER ? They aren;t going to offer this >in their expansion packs so why the hell shouldn't anyone be allowed to do it? > Actually, right after the release of MW2, one of the Activision programmers (what was Tim's last name? How quickly we forget...) specifically said that a 'Mech Builder was one of the expansions that would be released by Activision, along with a mission builder and additional campaigns. Steve Cagigas |"Greatest Hits albums are for Housewives Wrangler | and little girls!" af...@dayton.wright.edu | -- The Kids in the Hall
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1995Sep29.153137.531@kahuna.asc-yf.wpafb.af.mil>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<447buo$9s@kasey.umkc.edu> <44a2g7$2st@allnews.infi.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: wran...@dnaco.com (Steve Cagigas) Subject: Re: MW2 Patches released? Date: 1995/09/29 Message-ID: <1995Sep29.153137.531@kahuna.asc-yf.wpafb.af.mil> X-Deja-AN: 110978742 references: <447buo$9s@kasey.umkc.edu> <44a2g7$2st@allnews.infi.net> newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit