Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #5975Re: Console Envy
From: q... Brian Hein
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00
99 lines
5559 bytes
5559 bytes
In <435ne0$m...@also.hooked.net> dka...@also.hooked.net (Derek Kawaii) writes: >The way I see it, the PC has a lot of problems as a game machine. For one thing, the inputs are limited. If I want to play SSFIIT with a friend, we have to huddle up to my keyboard and type fast and furious. Have you ever tried to dragon punch by typing d,x,c Ctrl quickly as your friend elbows you? Oh sure, there are joypad solutions. But, since the PC allows only 2 buttons for two-person play, you only get to use fierce punches and kicks. I could spend some money on a Suncom key emulation pad or start soldering the connections my now defunct SNES >joypad, but the point is that its a force fit. Derek no need to soder. There are more input devices available for the PC than any other. I recommend the Gravis Phoenix, there you have 25 buttons that you can program any way you like. I have two and are considered by me a prise possesion. >There are excellent games written specifically for the PC to get around this: OMF2097, FX Fighter, etc... But, to me, they pale in comparison to titles like TSD, Tekken, and VF2. It will probably be another year before the PC can do games like that. This is because the PC does games by brute force. The next gen consoles have separate processors for manipulating polygons, texture mapping, video decoding, sound generation, scrolling, etc.... And the console's chips were designed to make great games work. The PC relies primarily on one fast chip to do (almost) everything. Sure, I can get a wave-table 32 bit sound card and even a video decoder card, but I ain't going to get anything like Virtual Fighter 2 on my PC no matter how much money I through at upgrades (3D cards will probably change this, but that's another story and a whole lot more >money). Sounds like you like fighters. Yep the weakest link in the PC gaming world. But you do mention the 3D boards. Today I pre-ordered the Diamond Edge 2MB PCI 3D board based on the Nividia chip for apr. $300. This board I feel will eliminate any bottle necks the PC has had in the past. It will do all those fancy polygonal equations, in fact it's an advanced circular polygon producing engine which cuts down dramaticaly on how many polys needed to render objects and at the same time producing much better graphics. For ex. a fighter on the PSX may take 2000 polys to produce on the Nividia chip it may take only 500, this means even more speed ultimatley. The Diamond edge also tackles bottlenecks such as wave-table excelleration and joystick readings. Hey did you know that just reading a joystick port on the PC takes more than 10% of your processors output. Again this board reduces it to zero. >And even if I could get VF2 for my tricked out PC, it would probably crash after Shun took one swig of his sake. This is a major problem for PCs running games. Since most worthwhile games are pushing the envelope, and your system is pushing the envelope, toes often get stepped on resulting in a frustrating gaming experience. With a >console, this just doesn't happen (well hardly ever). Yeah Setup is a PC problem. Win '95 is a big move forward. But face it, it will never be easier than a console. Hey you got to work for all great things! >To be fair to my PC, there are many excellent games to choose from which are thoroughly entertaining. They often have more depth and realism than most console games. Hell, half of the games for the next gen consoles are PC ports! Also, to be fair, the next gen consoles are great but they are not perfect. I've noticed a few flaws like large-scale pixelization of close ups and mountains appearing out of nowhere. Maybe U64 or M2 will fix this. Also, the resolution of the consoles doesn't seem as crisp as SVGA. (maybe its the fact that >they're limited to the TV) I feel overall the Consoles are gonna have the horesepower but in the end the users are gonna tire quickly to the poor display of the TV. By the end of the year there are gonna be some examples of what the new 3D boards can do and it's gonna shake more than a few people. 4x the graphics resolution is just gonna be to much for the consoles to compete with. Why the consoles don't hook up to a PC monitor is just stupid, optionally of course. >So, to sum it all up, I could dump $1000 plus into a quest to get the ultimate gaming system, or I could drop about $300 to get one of the next gen consoles (great but not ultimate) OR I could just wait things >out and finish Wing Commander III... I'm not sure what you have but I feel a DX2-66 VLB with a Nividia board, 8 meg. ram, 16-bit sound board and a 4x speed CD-Rom will play games quite well. I feel the rat race of upgrading processors will be finally slowed for a reasonable while. If you don't know, this is the gaming industries biggest concern, there loosing market because today everything pushes the limits way to much upgrades are killing their business. These boards are designed to bring back market share and the 486's as a viable gaming platform. BH
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<43cnk5$qnq@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<435ne0$m73@also.hooked.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: q...@ix.netcom.com (Brian Hein ) Subject: Re: Console Envy Date: 1995/09/15 Message-ID: <43cnk5$qnq@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 110247327 references: <435ne0$m73@also.hooked.net> organization: Netcom x-netcom-date: Fri Sep 15 1:27:49 PM PDT 1995 newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit