🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Pine.A32.3.91.950822...@umabnet.ab.umd.edu> "Mary L. Tod" <mt...@umabnet.ab.umd.edu> writes:
>From: "Mary L. Tod" <mt...@umabnet.ab.umd.edu>
>Subject: Re: Win95 a TRUE OS? Help a newbie!
>Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1995 08:45:58 -0400

>> > ...back to the original Question:
>> > Win95 a TRUE OS?    Yes.
>> Win'95 is much better than Win3.1/WFWG in all respects, its more stable, 
>> more compatible and a site easier to navigate, plus it still allows you 
>> to run all your old DOS apps as well.
>> | Allen Clarke                                                  
>a...@mround.bt.co.uk|
>> | TEL: 01473-649371                                                        
>|
>> | Fax: 01473-637523         MLB G/35, BT Labs, Ipswich, Suffolk, UK, IP5
>7RE|

>Let's go into that last comment a little more.  Does it run the old/slow 
>DOS as well as the new low and high mem intensive DOS well.  For example 
>Battles of Napoleon or the SSG Battlefront/Decisive Battles of the ACW on 
>the low/slow (namely made to run on PCXT or 286) and, say, Panzer General 
>or Stalingrad on the high end.
>           _
>         _/ \_  Calvin Timmerman, "The Old Wargamer" (on wife's id)
>        / \_/ \  - First Wargame: Africa Corps, 1966. Now I let the
>        \_/ \_/    PC roll the dice.





Excuse me - a purist when it comes to newsgroup subjects.

Is it me or do these WIN95 A TRUE OS? threads belong somewhere else?

Now I know most of you other .strategics have tried to conclude this 
perpetual follow-upping (by adding win95 et al to your killfile) but my 
newsreader, provided by MY :) university, does not have this killfile 
feature.  Flame me if I'm wrong, but not by email.  Send flames to 
comp.os.msdos.programmer or so. ;->

And for any of you WIN95-a-TRUE-OS?-Help-a-newbie writers, kindly mind where 
you send your follow-ups and posts.  They REALLY clutter up _*EVERY*_ 
(quadruple capslock) newsgroup, including some like comp.os.msdos.programmer.

And for any of you (am I repeating myself?) .strategics, maybe we should be 
just as bad as they are and start talking about CIV, MOO, MOM on THEIR 
groups... I mean this group is getting quite full anyway; 800 articles pile 
up during the weekend for me to read.

not a sig:   The above paragraph is definitely an implied threat; however, 
if you are a lawyer or a internet-cop or wish to prosecute me for whatever 
reason, the above paragraph somewhat unconventionally DOES represent the 
company I work for, its owner, and my directly responsible employer, all 
these parties as at the writing of this post.

BTW I have no employer at this moment - hahahaha.