Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #428Re: Win95 and games: good news...
From: r... Richard Ham
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 00:00
38 lines
3267 bytes
3267 bytes
I have to admit I haven't read all 5000+ posts on this subject, but I think everybody here is probably missing the point. It doesn't matter if W'95 will support true multitasking, or whether it runs DOS programs with less hassles than OS/2, or any of that crap. What matters is that in a short time after it's release, W'95 will come preloaded on the majority of new computers sold in the US. I read somewhere that Compaq is already commited to this, in fact. Plus it will sell like hotcakes regardless of whatever whining and bitching there is online. You see, we here on the 'net represent an incredibly small percentage of the computer gamers and regular users in the real world. The latest issue of CGW (or maybe is was PC Gamer - sorry, the magazines are at work) mentioned the results of some feedback study they did. Only an incredibly small percentage of it's readers ever logged onto major commercial online services (Cserve, AOL, Genie, etc) and an even smaller number of people used the internet. When all is said and done, we here are very small group of people arguing amongst ourselves, and computer makers know that. The overwhelming majority of users out there get any info they have from Magazines (which for the most are lining up in favor of W'95), friends (who read those positive articles), and store clerks (who want to sell the dominant OS so they can sell more apps for that OS). Once W'95 moves into it's position of dominance (where DOS/Win 3.1 are now), what makes you think Origin, LucasArts, Sierra, Microprose, or any other company is going to continue making titles for an OS system that only a small portion of zealots will be using? Where's the money in that, versus the money required to develop for that minority platform? Maybe if OS/2 continues to develop more followers, you might see OS/2 versions of really popular titles (as you see Mac versions occasionally of big PC games), but they'll be few and far between. What IBM will have to do is bend over backwards, crippling its OS to insure compatibility with W'95 products - much as Microsoft is having to do now to insure compatibility with all previous DOS/Win 3.1 products. Sierra has all but commited to Windows. Origin is doing Ultima 9 as a Windows only product. Wake up and smell the coffee, people! It's only a matter of time! -rich
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<D7CBu8.EpK@eskimo.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3mtquj$hq2@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <D77pB0.8BD@caprica.com> <Pine.CVX.3.91.950418115058.20616E-100000@gibbs.oit.unc.edu> <3n0rvg$13vn@bubba.ucc.okstate.edu> <3n1n10$ipp@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> <3n3j7a$12em@bubba.ucc.okstate.edu> <3n3r1s$gll@sundog.tiac.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: r...@eskimo.com (Richard Ham) Subject: Re: Win95 and games: good news... Date: 1995/04/20 Message-ID: <D7CBu8.EpK@eskimo.com> X-Deja-AN: 101263137 sender: use...@eskimo.com (News User Id) x-nntp-posting-host: tia1.eskimo.com references: <3mtquj$hq2@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu> <D77pB0.8BD@caprica.com> <Pine.CVX.3.91.950418115058.20616E-100000@gibbs.oit.unc.edu> <3n0rvg$13vn@bubba.ucc.okstate.edu> <3n1n10$ipp@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> <3n3j7a$12em@bubba.ucc.okstate.edu> <3n3r1s$gll@sundog.tiac.net> organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc,comp.os.os2.games Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit