🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <417gn4$b...@news.MillComm.COM>,
   hi...@mill2.millcomm.com (jason thomas) wrote:
>!In article <4139st$b...@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, gcg...@pitt.edu (Geoffrey 
C Grabowski) says:
>!>
>!!>In article <40ph4u$s...@dobie.loop.com>, PRoPaGaNDiST <dp...@loop.com> 
wrote:
>!!>
>!>>Well when you take into accout the laws of thermo dynaimc weight 
distrbtuion 
>!>>allocation static distrotiom acid neo-fl;ux thing a miggjigger this all 
makes 
>!>>sense, otherwise the sapce time contimunmun would cease to exist, and we 
>!>>wouylbe prbabley fukcing 3 other gfa;laxies, so I think... shit I foget 
what 
>!>>I;
>!>> , talking about jabout.; fuck you too. ANd I 3want an oreao cooke too. 
asll 
>!>>of you are fucking idoiots heheh yeah. fyucking morons. 
>!>>(note: arther was completely fuckingmggg druy m at time of hte positng, 
>!>>usppport the weed revouluitiom and stuf.)
>!>
>!>        You know, this is a good irreverent sort of answer, 'it works, now
>!>eat your magnetojargonic explanations and run along.' Unfortunatly, the 
>!>author was pretty obviously dropping acid when they wrote it. Once again, 
>!>proof that, while getting all jacked up alone or with friends may be fun, 
>!>getting all jacked up and making posts for a few thousand people to read 
>!>is not such a good idea. Oh, I just can't wait till Windows 95 comes out 
>!>and the Newbie Flood hits.
>
>Blow me.  I quite enjoyed reading that; it beats the normal geeky stuffy
>flamewar by a real good margin.  
Aff.  I thought it was funny.  Not Nobel prize material, granted, but what the 
hell.  It was amusing.  And I know that the poster is actually a sentient 
being, sans Stuff <grin>
But that's just MY opinion! :)