🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <806458...@markbz.demon.co.uk>, Ma...@markbz.demon.co.uk (M R)
writes:
>
> Msg-ID: <806458...@markbz.demon.co.uk>
> References: <3uph6u$e...@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
> Posted: Sun, 23 Jul 95 00:12:41 GMT
>
> Org.  : - VFF -
>
> In article <3uph6u$e...@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
>            a...@ix.netcom.com "Alexander O. Norris " writes:
>
> > a friend
> > installe a recent build on a clean HD, no dos installed.  however,
> > under close inspection, parts of dos, certain files like doskey, etc.,
> > were installed under /windows/command
> >  however, you really don't need dos 6.22 after you have installed
> > win95.
> >
>
> It has doskey etc in the Command dir so that if you ran DOS in a window
> you can still load doskey.  What's wrong with that? If you have no need
> for DOS and Win95 supports your hardware (most is) you can delete your
> autoexec.bat and config.sys etc and do away with DOS.
>
>
> --
> Mark Rogers.
>                       +:+:+  Team OS Bias  +:+:+
> +:+:+  Warning! Major numerical output error has occurred -  +:+:+
>                  +:+:+   Call 9@>1*Xm for help   +:+:+


Mark, take this debate on W95 vs every other god damn OS in the world to
some other group! Many people(including me) are REALLY starting to get
tired of seeing more W95 msg's then game msg's for cryin out loud.