Re: Win95 a TRUE OS? Help a newbie!

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #3200

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#3200

From: her... Michael Hermann
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 00:00

10 lines
1216 bytes

In article <12...@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>, M.A.S...@ukc.ac.uk (Martin Searle) writes:
|> 
|> WIN95 a better windows, YES !, Multitasking NO!. Martin's definition: only
|> slightly less of a big virus than Windows 3.1. If you want decent
|> Multi-tasking then go for OS/2 or Linux, Me I'll stick with 3.1 until a
|> new fixed version of Windows 95 comes out. 

don't expect that version  to multitask any better, it's the design not a bug

 -Mike

Technical Details

Message-ID: <421sg1$o49@news.rz.uni-passau.de>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<3v8usi$mci@tornews.torolab.ibm.com> <416h0n$qfp@sulla.cyberstore.ca> <1995Aug25.081238.14344@newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de> <41m89c$2b@feenix.metronet.com> <12628@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: her...@urolph.uni-passau.de (Michael Hermann)
Subject: Re: Win95 a TRUE OS? Help a newbie!
Date: 1995/08/30
Message-ID: <421sg1$o49@news.rz.uni-passau.de>
X-Deja-AN: 109149994
distribution: world
sender: hermann@urolph (Michael Hermann)
references: <3v8usi$mci@tornews.torolab.ibm.com> <416h0n$qfp@sulla.cyberstore.ca> <1995Aug25.081238.14344@newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de> <41m89c$2b@feenix.metronet.com> <12628@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>
organization: University of Passau, Germany
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message