🚀 go-pugleaf

>But the DOS part of Win95 is still good old, non-reentrant, real mode,
>DOS. It will not change however much you would like it to. Without
>good old 16 bit (who cares about the bitness???), real-mode (this is
>important, and BAD for DOS), non-reentrant (this is important and BAD
>for DOS) DOS Windows 95 will not function at all. Not even if you
>use something else to boot it. Windows 95 needs DOS to run Win32
>software.
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Terje Bergesen - Bergesen Data

Hey, I remember you.  Terje Bergesen - OS/2  zealot.

Hey everybody, don't believe anything that comes out of an OS/2 zealots 
mouth.  Anybody who hates Microsoft is going to bash everything they 
make.  When they can communicate well its even more dangerous because 
they can persuade people to believe in the same false ideas that they do.

Heres what everbody should do.  Read, the posts of Windows 95 -vs- OS/2 
but don't believe any of it; for or against Windows 95.  Most of it is 
well presented bull shit anyway.  Instead, wait until after Windwos 95 
comes out and you read an article in it from a respected publication.
-- 
_____________________________________________________________________________
                    __________    No matter where you go,
                   /  ______  \       there you are.
                  |  |      |  |