Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #3085Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-)
From: jma... Joseph T. Malloy
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:00
43 lines
3038 bytes
3038 bytes
In article <3tvvet$2...@news.rz.uni-passau.de> her...@spock.uni-passau.de (Michael Hermann) writes: >In article <3ttpu9$7...@itsmail1.hamilton.edu>, jma...@itsmail1.hamilton.edu (Joseph T. Malloy) writes: >|> In article <toma.80...@expert.cc.purdue.edu> to...@expert.cc.purdue.edu (Duke Toma) writes: >|> >jma...@itsmail1.hamilton.edu (Joseph T. Malloy) writes: >|> > >|> >>Ok, I just took a look through all the CAB files and the rest of the >|> >>CD-ROM on the Plus! pack (build 300) and I could not find anything that >|> >>looked like a fix for anything. >|> > >|> >Um...hello? Win95 is not in it's final version yet. Of course there's >|> >no bug fixes in the Plus pack yet because they can still easily change >|> >the Win95 code. The bug fixes will be put in sometime between the time >|> >Win95 goes to manufacturing and the time the Plus pack does. MS already >|> >said they will only fix "recall class bugs" in the latest build. Some of >|> >the other bugs stand a chance of being corrected in the add-on. >|> >|> No, you don't understand. The claim made was that the Plus! pack is going >|> to fix bugs, so if that is true, certainly the expectation is that we >|> would see some sort of patch work already. Besides, if MS can make money >|> selling a separate CD-ROM (or disks), why wouldn't they? So what you're >|> saying is that the Plus! pack will fix bugs, but the bug fixes won't be >|> beta tested. Sorry, this isn't your father's IBM! > >No, you don't understand, as long there is a beta going on, there won't >be any bugfixes in the Plus pack (what for, you get new betas..) > >Once Win95 is released, and a while after that the plus pack, it will >include bugfixes for those bugs that have been found and corrected by >then. As to testing them, of course MS does test them, how do you think >the NT bugfixes (quarterly) do work ? No, you don't understand. (Gee, this is fun!) Explain the claim that that the Plus! pack contains bug fixes. The claim isn't that Microsoft is not going to release bug patches for Windows, it was that the medium of delivery was going to be the Plus! pack. As noted by someone else, the goal is to release the Plus! pack *simultaneously* with Windows 95. Why release bug fixes at the same time as the product? (Wise guy answers are excluded!) The Plus! pack may eventually contain bug fixes, but I rather doubt it. MS will also probably make then available via FTP, BBS, and sell them as well.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3u0geq$7s8@itsmail1.hamilton.edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: jma...@itsmail1.hamilton.edu (Joseph T. Malloy) Subject: Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-) Date: 1995/07/12 Message-ID: <3u0geq$7s8@itsmail1.hamilton.edu> X-Deja-AN: 106168889 organization: Hamilton College newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit