🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3mtquj$h...@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>, yn...@merhaba.cc.columbia.edu (Yann Nicolas) writes:

[STUFF DELETED so that I don't barf.]

>There ya go, my $0.02 gaming opinion of Windows 95...
>
>Opinions/comments/questions welcome... :)

Opinions? Comments? Q's? 

Oh ya I have one or 2. You sir, are the person who started this. While I 
appreciate the "heads up" with WIN95. You posted to every gaming group?

AND NOT TO AN OPERATING SYSTEM GROUP? 

While I am quite happy to wade thru this "stuff". I really am curious
how you rationalize that? 

We are too busy arguing about whether Wing Commander III, XWING (and alot
of other  Space based games/sims) should be posted in the flight-sim group, 
to give a rats-ass about WINBLOWS.

I will admit though. From what I've read WIN95 might not be that bad :-)

If our newly self-appointed NETCOP was doing his job, this would have been
stopped long ago. As it is now, I'm affraid he is fired... 

>
>PS: OS/2 users will tell me that "OS/2 did that a long time ago", but
>I tried it and didn't like it...
>
>(~~~) *=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* ( Yann Nicolas ) =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= (~~~) 
> |\|  Columbia U. Libraries -- ALLEZ RENNES!! -- nic...@columbia.edu |/|
> |\|         ________________/ SiXXX in '96!! \____________ Go 49ers! |/|
>(___) *=*=*=' http://www.cc.columbia.edu/~yn25/soccer.html `=*=*=*=* (___)