Re: OS/2 vs Win'95(or '96)

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #2138

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#2138

From: bad... Jonathan Badger
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 00:00

15 lines
1485 bytes

big_...@ix.netcom.com (Big_Bear ) writes:

>I have heard of a Beta virsion of WIN95, but is it
>the true Win95 Program!!!!  NO IT ISN'T!!!  So lets do the world a
>favor and DROP THE ARUMENT that OS/2 is better the Win95 or the other
>way around!!  When it comes out and you have tried it, not like that
>lyer that says he did and didn't, then you can tell the world how
>FUCKUP each one is compard to each other.

Hmm. You're right. The so-called beta of Win'95 that we've all been
using isn't the real Win'95. It was actually created by the same bunch
bunch of German jokers who created the fake Amiga emulator. All it does 
is show PCX files of Win'95 screens -- it really isn't running any programs.
We've all just been too stupid to notice. I *knew* it couldn't be a real
Microsoft product -- it doesn't crash enough.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <badger.804202549@phylo>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<vendettaDApDvy.L0C@netcom.com> <3sisen$aqs@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <3sl0sj$tkc@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <matuseDArCx9.34q@netcom.com> <3sn6rs$rop@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: bad...@phylo.life.uiuc.edu (Jonathan Badger)
Subject: Re: OS/2 vs Win'95(or '96)
Date: 1995/06/26
Message-ID: <badger.804202549@phylo>
X-Deja-AN: 105124420
references: <vendettaDApDvy.L0C@netcom.com> <3sisen$aqs@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <3sl0sj$tkc@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <matuseDArCx9.34q@netcom.com> <3sn6rs$rop@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message