Re: OS/2 vs Win'95(or '96)

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #2136

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#2136

From: mat... Matuse
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 00:00

13 lines
1370 bytes

In article <3sl0sj$t...@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> jord...@benji.Colorado.EDU (JORDAN  SPENSER AARON) writes:
>>I agree, that OS2/WARP can kick the shit out of Win95.  I tell you
>>this, there is a still a use for Win95, since OS2/WARP can only run 95%
>>of Windows programs. You will still need windows to run the other 5%
>>and you can use the disks to wipe the shit off your asshole when you
>>get done taking a shit.  Well unless you have the CD-ROM version, then
>>you have a good frizbee to though around the yard.
>
>Windows 95 kicks the shit out of OS/2.  And I prefer to wipe my ass with 
>OS/2 installation disks.

Since you have admitted to never having SEEN os/2, please back up this 
claim that win is better.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <matuseDArCx9.34q@netcom.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <vendettaDApDvy.L0C@netcom.com> <3sisen$aqs@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <3sl0sj$tkc@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: mat...@netcom.com (Matuse)
Subject: Re: OS/2 vs Win'95(or '96)
Date: 1995/06/26
Message-ID: <matuseDArCx9.34q@netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 105041973
sender: mat...@netcom6.netcom.com
references: <vendettaDApDvy.L0C@netcom.com> <3sisen$aqs@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <3sl0sj$tkc@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU>
organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message