🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3tpnbn$16...@heart.cas.und.nodak.edu>, da...@aero.und.nodak.edu 
says...
>
>Hank Leukart (ap...@cleveland.freenet.edu) wrote:
>: In article <3tmaqs$i...@carbon.concom.com>,
>:    syse...@carbon.concom.com (Aaron Bilger) wrote:
>: >In article <3tl62p$s...@news.globalx.net>,
>: >King Neptune  <dmo...@globalx.net> wrote:
>: >>WIN NT with Object Oriented 
>: >>interface.  It is already in Beta from what I have heard.
>: >
>: >If so, please tell how we can get in the beta program.  What 
companies or
>: >individuals are eligible?  Whom must they contact?  If none of these
>: >questions are answerable, it is because Cairo is _not_ in beta. 
>
>:       The Windows 95 interface for Windows NT 3.1 is currently in 
ALPHA 
>: testing.  It's release is scheduled within two months after 95's 
release 
>: (which will be August 24th).
>
>Err... what does that have to do with Cairo?  If you're trying to claim
>the Win95 interface is object based you should check again before making
>a fool of yourself.  Cairo is most certainly AT LEAST 1.5-2 years from
>shipping.  Win95 3.5x (not 3.1) with a 95 interface is due in '96, not
>in October.  Cairo is NOT in beta testing, in fact a lot of Cairo 
developers
>were pulled from Cairo earlier this year to try to force Win95 out the
>door in '95.  Are you having a bad fact day?
>
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Jim Dahl                           | 
>da...@agassiz.cas.und.nodak.edu     | jad...@badlands.nodak.edu
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh...? I was just reading through here (I rarely come to these groups, 
but I was posting my for sale message and blah blah blah...) and I'm 
wondering now, what the HELL is Cairo? What does it have to do with 
Win95? And in terms of how fast Win95 will run, be it on a P5 or a P6, 
how can anyone but Microsoft be QUITE sure how fast it will be if it 
isn't even released yet? And what's the deal with the Windows NT 
compatibility with Win95? I thought Windows NT was for a LAN or a 
server...? It seems like a better version of Win3.1, from what I'm 
hearing though.  Anyone who can help me out, thanks in advance!

		-- Psyc!