Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #1911Re: Win'95(or '96) IS A FUCKING JOKE!!!
From: d... Dan Ho
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 00:00
33 lines
1524 bytes
1524 bytes
After lurking on this thread for a while, i have come to the conclusion that the Win95 users and OS/2 users are comparing apples and oranges. (Sorry for the cliche). My observations of your arguments: OS/2 Superior architecture. Win95 More Compatible. So, Win95 Kicks OS/2's ass in ease of use but OS/2 kicks Win95's ass in power usage. Which OS is best depends on what you're usiing it for. If you are doing actual *WORK*, then you might want OS/2 so that you will minimise the risk of losing data due to crashes. If you're gaming most of the time, get Win95 for its compatibility. Hope I have solved and appeased both sides! Dan -- Daniel Ho _o gokyu shoshin ryu aikijujutsuka /< L University of Waterloo, Math, Honours, Co-op, Computer Science
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DAu6KD.LA3@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3shdoq$pbg@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <804113713snz@the-zoo.demon.co.uk> <3sleni$jkf@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <3smt1o$7cu@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: d...@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (Dan Ho) Subject: Re: Win'95(or '96) IS A FUCKING JOKE!!! Date: 1995/06/27 Message-ID: <DAu6KD.LA3@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> X-Deja-AN: 105124685 sender: ne...@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (news spool owner) references: <3shdoq$pbg@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU> <804113713snz@the-zoo.demon.co.uk> <3sleni$jkf@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <3smt1o$7cu@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> organization: University of Waterloo newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.f MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit