Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #1850Re: OS/2 vs Win'95(or '96)
From: a... Alexander O. Norris
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 1995 00:00
8 lines
1188 bytes
1188 bytes
Hey crack smoking friend, yeah, you in the giant BLUE overalls with OS/2 painted all over your face: get a recent copy of the Win95 beta, ok? OS/2 SUCKS! plain and simple. how well does OS/2 handle multimdeia huh? how about sound cards, joysticks, etc? What, you didn't mention the LONG, TEDIOUS, configuration info you need to setup for every DOS program you run? Too bad, Win95 does it AUTOMATICALLY. What can run DOS programs better than DOS 7.0 (win95)???? 'Nuff said
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3sfqli$fa5@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3q8ngd$rej@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <3qcl9u$7k6@newsy.ifm.liu.se> <801825624snz@cbsltd.demon.co.uk> <Pine.A32.3.91.950530041328.50503C-100000@ <vis_cah-3105950721560001@xdial1-slip1.shsu.edu> <3sdhju$p9@its.hooked.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: a...@ix.netcom.com (Alexander O. Norris ) Subject: Re: OS/2 vs Win'95(or '96) Date: 1995/06/24 Message-ID: <3sfqli$fa5@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 104991921 distribution: world references: <3q8ngd$rej@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <3qcl9u$7k6@newsy.ifm.liu.se> <801825624snz@cbsltd.demon.co.uk> <Pine.A32.3.91.950530041328.50503C-100000@ <vis_cah-3105950721560001@xdial1-slip1.shsu.edu> <3sdhju$p9@its.hooked.net> organization: Netcom newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.f MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit