Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #1695Re: Windows 95 & OS/2
From: lpar...
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 00:00
54 lines
3060 bytes
3060 bytes
In <3vf0uj$n...@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>, laur...@ix.netcom.com (Hungs) writes: >In <DCHu6...@cunews.carleton.ca> cor...@chat.carleton.ca (Christina >O'Regan) writes: >> >>Jeremy Bee (b...@sfu.ca) wrote: >>> In article <3v9fou$8...@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net>, >>> There are also a lot of games that will run in SAM mode under Win95 >that won't >>> even show a glimmer under Warp, like ones that need direct access to >the >>> hardware. If you are a gamer, you gotta get Win95, both for Dos >compatibility >>> with the old games and because of the new ones being written for 95 >right now, >>> which also will not run under Warp. >> >>What? I'm a gamer, and I am not going to buy Win95. If I want to play >>games, I am going to use DOS. Remember, the game WAS written for DOS, >>and since I currently have DOS (Not a MS-DOS), I am not going to >>switch to a technically inferior product so I can run DOS games. If >>you want to use DOS games, why not use DOS? What's the point in >>upgrading if you aren't going to use any of the "new" technology? >>It's pointless! >> >>> Jeremy >> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>David Kennedy >>Carleton University >>Computer and Systems Engineering >>Email address: cor...@chat.carleton.ca >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Well then you'll miss out on all the Windows '95 games. They run as >fast or unnoticeably slower than DOS. Also you will lose multitasking. > If you want to see a nice Win95 game you should take a look at the >pre-Alpha game that was ported from the Sega: PitFall Harry. It's a >really nice game. Anyways MS is designing Win95 a lot around making it >a better gaming platform. Win95 is the future of games. > >Ted Hung Not being a gamer, at least on a PC, why would you care about the multitasking to run a game?? Wouldn't you just be playing one game at a time? This is a question, not flame-bait. For me, games are played with a games machine, I just never have been totally impressed with PC games, at least since the Atari's and C-64's disappeared. // Lloyd Parsons, Herrin, IL // lpar...@midwest.net //
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<26NGDy$030@cdale1.midwest.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3urmk3$19k_002@line05.socketis.net> <3v2t3h$qht@news.tuwien.ac.at> <boP5mqrPwxPS078yn@vestnett.no> <3v9fou$8hs@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net> <3vc3pd$ng@seymour.sfu.ca> <DCHu6B.FLC@cunews.carleton.ca> <3vf0uj$nnt@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: lpar...@midwest.net Subject: Re: Windows 95 & OS/2 Date: 1995/07/30 Message-ID: <26NGDy$030@cdale1.midwest.net> X-Deja-AN: 107185526 distribution: world references: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3urmk3$19k_002@line05.socketis.net> <3v2t3h$qht@news.tuwien.ac.at> <boP5mqrPwxPS078yn@vestnett.no> <3v9fou$8hs@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net> <3vc3pd$ng@seymour.sfu.ca> <DCHu6B.FLC@cunews.carleton.ca> <3vf0uj$nnt@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> organization: Midwest Internet x-nntpdaemon: changi 0.9 for OS/2 reply-to: lpar...@midwest.net newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit