🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #1695

Re: Windows 95 & OS/2

#1695
From: lpar...
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 00:00
54 lines
3060 bytes
In <3vf0uj$n...@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>, laur...@ix.netcom.com (Hungs) writes:
>In <DCHu6...@cunews.carleton.ca> cor...@chat.carleton.ca (Christina
>O'Regan) writes: 
>>
>>Jeremy Bee (b...@sfu.ca) wrote:
>>> In article <3v9fou$8...@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net>,
>>> There are also a lot of games that will run in SAM mode under Win95
>that won't 
>>> even show a glimmer under Warp, like ones that need direct access to
>the 
>>> hardware.  If you are a gamer, you gotta get Win95, both for Dos
>compatibility 
>>> with the old games and because of the new ones being written for 95
>right now, 
>>> which also will not run under Warp.
>>
>>What? I'm a gamer, and I am not going to buy Win95.  If I want to play
>>games, I am going to use DOS. Remember, the game WAS written for DOS,
>>and since I currently have DOS (Not a MS-DOS), I am not going to
>>switch to a technically inferior product so I can run DOS games.  If
>>you want to use DOS games, why not use DOS?  What's the point in
>>upgrading if you aren't going to use any of the "new" technology? 
>>It's pointless!
>>
>>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>David Kennedy             
>>Carleton University       
>>Computer and Systems Engineering
>>Email address: cor...@chat.carleton.ca
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Well then you'll miss out on all the Windows '95 games. They run as
>fast or unnoticeably slower than DOS.  Also you will lose multitasking.
> If you want to see a nice Win95 game you should take a look at the
>pre-Alpha game that was ported from the Sega: PitFall Harry. It's a
>really nice game. Anyways MS is designing Win95 a lot around making it
>a better gaming platform.  Win95 is the future of games.
>
>Ted Hung

Not being a gamer, at least on a PC, why would you care about the 
multitasking to run a game??  Wouldn't you just be playing one 
game at a time?  This is a question, not flame-bait.

For me, games are played with a games machine, I just never have 
been totally impressed with PC games, at least since the Atari's 
and C-64's disappeared.

// Lloyd Parsons, Herrin, IL
// lpar...@midwest.net
//
Technical Details
Message-ID: <26NGDy$030@cdale1.midwest.net>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3urmk3$19k_002@line05.socketis.net> <3v2t3h$qht@news.tuwien.ac.at> <boP5mqrPwxPS078yn@vestnett.no> <3v9fou$8hs@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net> <3vc3pd$ng@seymour.sfu.ca> <DCHu6B.FLC@cunews.carleton.ca> <3vf0uj$nnt@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: lpar...@midwest.net
Subject: Re: Windows 95 & OS/2
Date: 1995/07/30
Message-ID: <26NGDy$030@cdale1.midwest.net>
X-Deja-AN: 107185526
distribution: world
references: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3urmk3$19k_002@line05.socketis.net> <3v2t3h$qht@news.tuwien.ac.at> <boP5mqrPwxPS078yn@vestnett.no> <3v9fou$8hs@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net> <3vc3pd$ng@seymour.sfu.ca> <DCHu6B.FLC@cunews.carleton.ca> <3vf0uj$nnt@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
organization: Midwest Internet
x-nntpdaemon: changi 0.9 for OS/2
reply-to: lpar...@midwest.net
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit