🚀 go-pugleaf

>==========Joseph Coughlan, 9/22/95==========
>
>In article <DFAM4...@eskimo.com>, fut...@eskimo.com (Tim
>Gerchmez) writes:
>|> g3e$9...@lonepeak.wasatch.com>
>|> 
>|> In article <43pg3e$9...@lonepeak.wasatch.com>,
bo...@wasatch.com says...
>|> >
>|> >In article <DF70A...@eskimo.com>, fut...@eskimo.com (Tim
>Gerchmez) writes:
>|> >
>|> >|> Close.  OS/2 applications are not in the retail outlets
>because there 
>|> *ISN'T*
>|> > 
>|> >|> a demand.  As many have stated, OS/2 users don't like
>upgrading, they like 
>|> >|> keeping what works.  This very philosophy is helping to
kill OS/2.
>|> >
>|> >So...Windows is successful because Windows users are lemmings who
>|> >upgrade whenever MS tells them to?  Does this mean that Windows 
>|> >users are stupid and like throwing their money away?
>|> >
>|> >I'm sure that isn't what you _meant_ to say...
>|> 
>|> That isn't what I said, that's how you INTERPRETED what I
>said.  What I was 
>|> essentially saying is that it's money and the spending of
>money that keeps the 
>|> software market alive.  OS/2 users apparently don't buy a
>whole lot of native 
>|> OS/2 apps, or there would be a lot more available.
>
>
>There are more OS/2 Wordprocessors than  for win32.
>
>Great point Tim.
>

This is probably true, especially since Windows 95 has only been
realeased for 3 weeks. However, what does this have to do about
games? After all, it is being cross-posted to a games group. If
you want to talk about word processors, that's fine. Just limit
this to an appropriate group.
>
>
>-- 
>
>-- Dr. J.C.Coughlan, jcou...@gaia.arc.nasa.gov