Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #104Re: Win95 and games: good news...
From: swil... Stephen Wilhelm
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 00:00
39 lines
2960 bytes
2960 bytes
> That _must_ be why OS/2 is so popular? Thats why games like Doom > work so well on OS/2 and not Win95? :) (Unless you wait a year and a > half for IBM to port it). You have to keep in mind that there was only one person working on the port, and really, it isn't IBM's responsibility anyway. DOOM *DID* run under OS/2, but Id changed it and now it doesn't. Starting with version 1.2, Doom requires direct access to the hardware (ie sound card), which means that it won't run under OS/2 or WinNT. I might add, that it is a good thing not to let programs access the hardware, that is why OS/2 and NT isn't affected by viruses and helps out its crash protection quite a bit. Id made the change, and for no apparant reason. What I find interesting is that Id went out of their way for a Linux port of Doom, and turned around and screwed the OS/2 market. My solution, make another DOS setting, something like "Allow direct access to sound card". Which should always be off, unless you run Doom. Kind of crazy to make a change for just one program, though. > I think OS/2 is great. Without OS/2, Microsoft wouldn't have a > "goal". MS knows that if they don't do a better job than OS/2, they're in > trouble. I have experience with OS/2 and Win95, and Win95 has > already made Warp look like Mach. >From what I have seen, at least on the technical end, Win95 is nothing new. It isn't better than OS/2. Still have a 64K heap space, 640K conventional memory barrier (come on, is it that hard to implement a flat memory module?), FAT filesystem, etc. Win95 is DOS and Windows revamped, with a pretty, easy to use, interface. For most users, it is great, but for people who need more, it doesn't cut it. I for one, run more than 10 things at a time quite often, and Win95's limit to 8 programs (that damn 64K heap) get's on my nerves. Also, I can't have any of them crash, and after one week of the Win95 beta, I will stick with OS/2 or WinNT. Both offer what I need and both are FAR superior to Win95. -- \_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\ Stephen Wilhelm Majors: Computer Science | MC Computer Mississippi College Engineering Physics | Support Team swil...@mc.edu Minor: Mathematics | sup...@mc.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3nm415$bau@csc.mc.edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3mtquj$hq2@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>,<3mu3la$5rd@news.dgsys.com> <3n8tec$u3l@mustang.smcvt.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: swil...@csc.mc.edu (Stephen Wilhelm) Subject: Re: Win95 and games: good news... Date: 1995/04/26 Message-ID: <3nm415$bau@csc.mc.edu> X-Deja-AN: 101590844 distribution: world references: <3mtquj$hq2@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>,<3mu3la$5rd@news.dgsys.com> <3n8tec$u3l@mustang.smcvt.edu> followup-to: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc organization: Mississippi College, Clinton, MS -- USA newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit