Article View: alt.pl.wirelesslan
Article #41734Re: ASUS WL-100W (300Mbit/s) 802.11n versus HP/BroadCom 802.11g
From: maslak
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:58
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:58
5 lines
1277 bytes
1277 bytes
> Z n-kami jest jeszcze gorzej jesli chodzi rzeczywista wydajnosc > w stosunku do zyczen .... 8 MB/s a praktycznie okolo 5MB/s I racja brachu. To tak jak z reklamą internetu EDGE lub 3G - 7,2 Mb/s a w rzeczywistości około 200-300kb/s ;)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gl3sr0$sq7$1@node1.news.atman.pl>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!newsfeed.atman.pl!not-for-mailReferences:
<fnlhm8$1uo$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <479e4a56$1@news.home.net.pl> <fnlj6v$5ka$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <479e4f85$1@news.home.net.pl> <fnljig$j09$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <479e51bb$1@news.home.net.pl> <fnll32$a17$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <fnlnan$c89$1@news.onet.pl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!newsfeed.atman.pl!not-for-mail From: maslak <piotr-usuntekst-@maslak.waw.pl> Newsgroups: alt.pl.wirelesslan Subject: Re: ASUS WL-100W (300Mbit/s) 802.11n versus HP/BroadCom 802.11g Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:58:38 +0100 Organization: ATMAN Lines: 5 Message-ID: <gl3sr0$sq7$1@node1.news.atman.pl> References: <fnlhm8$1uo$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <479e4a56$1@news.home.net.pl> <fnlj6v$5ka$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <479e4f85$1@news.home.net.pl> <fnljig$j09$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <479e51bb$1@news.home.net.pl> <fnll32$a17$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <fnlnan$c89$1@news.onet.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: nat.hector.com.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: node1.news.atman.pl 1232434848 29511 217.17.35.39 (20 Jan 2009 07:00:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@atman.pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:00:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) In-Reply-To: <fnlnan$c89$1@news.onet.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit