Article View: alt.games.x-com
Article #35854Re: X-Com was a commercial FAILURE !!!!
From: Mel C
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:33
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:33
8 lines
1209 bytes
1209 bytes
Bruno Beam wrote: > The reason is simple : It had no ninjas ... I disagree. Just because you can't see them, doesn't mean they're not there... - MEl C
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<41c1d522$0$78010$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.zanker.org!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool03.plus.net!212.159.2.75.MISMATCH!ptn-nntp-spool01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<9f63c9ae.0412160033.61286821@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.zanker.org!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool03.plus.net!212.159.2.75.MISMATCH!ptn-nntp-spool01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net!not-for-mail Message-ID: <41c1d522$0$78010$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net> From: Mel C <mel@EGGSthe-eendBACON.orgSPAM> Subject: Re: X-Com was a commercial FAILURE !!!! Newsgroups: alt.games.x-com Followup-To: alt.games.x-com Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:33:36 +0000 References: <9f63c9ae.0412160033.61286821@posting.google.com> User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 8 Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net) NNTP-Posting-Host: a57c2aa6.ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net X-Trace: DXC=^QV?gff4cB]; 3O7<jEOAmSigd3Y`7Rb; ^YZmCHj47lfUol\XL4Y_5`T]4Cn3T5UGQU8Rl_I0fOZKP?>Ud]; 18TL_ X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit