🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.x-com
Article #515

XCom [UFO]: Arming Interceptors

#515
From: cap... Ian York
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:00
17 lines
1126 bytes
Does anyone know any good reason for arming Interceptors with 
different weapons in the two slots?

>From experience it seems that using both weapon bays for the
same weapon make the best combo. Even at the start the Cannon
is pretty useless (I sell them, & all their ammo). An
Interceptor with two Stingray (?) Launchers can handle all
the smaller UFOs, & one with two Avalanche Launches can
handle Medium UFOs (& even threaten Large UFOs if it has
back-up).

does anyone bother with the Laser Cannon? Plasma Beams & then
Fusion Ball Lauchers appear to be the best research pathway
to follow...

--
IY.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6ulf6t$1nr$1@mimas.brunel.ac.uk>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: cap...@brunel.ac.uk (Ian York)
Subject: XCom [UFO]: Arming Interceptors
Date: 1998/09/27
Message-ID: <6ulf6t$1nr$1@mimas.brunel.ac.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 395311622
X-Complaints-To: use...@brunel.ac.uk
X-Trace: mimas.brunel.ac.uk 906903581 1787 134.83.176.1 (27 Sep 1998 13:39:41 GMT)
Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Sep 1998 13:39:41 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.games.x-com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit