🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.x-com
Article #35506

Re: WHAT ?

#35506
From: Jason
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:06
31 lines
2804 bytes
Elmar Bijlsma wrote:

> Hiya.
> A question I always asked myself. Should I recommend Combat Mission to
> X-Com players? The scale of the combat is one level up and there is no
> managment bit other that picking your forces for a quick battle but I
> always found the pace and basic idea of combat somewhat similar. 
> So fess up, who else here plays combat mission? (or wants to do so
> after playing one of the demos at http://www.battlefront.com ) 
> <hint, hint>
> I for one rate Combat Mission on a par with X-Com.

Yeah, I would reccomend it, with the simple caveat that *it's not squad 
level*. It operates at more of a battalion level, with the smallest 
units usually being squads or half squads, with the occaisional special 
purpose soldier like a sniper or somesuch. You dont have the same level 
of control as you do in xcom, and your guys very much have a mind of 
their own sometimes.

That said, the game has some really nifty commands to control your units 
with, great graphics, and the armoured combat is to die for. It also 
helps if you're into WW2.

I would also rate Combat Mission with X-Com. They're both the same kind 
of genre-breaking/defining type of game, even though they're really 
quite different.

Believe it or not, I was first introduced to CM by Det, way back when we 
were still brainstorming ideas for Genesis.

- Jason
Technical Details
Message-ID: <SE3zb.478$AM3.54129@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!cyclone.southeast.rr.com!news-post.tampabay.rr.com!twister.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <GIhxb.19$SN1.21147@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net> <C0txb.292556$pT1.14204@twister.nyc.rr.com> <jlddsvge2tj86j02vv5mfpsoi8iqcoar3h@4ax.com> <f0Dxb.2495$O42.991906@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net> <139esvco2rkl5qhreme9eninco9va4iqem@4ax.com> <54dyb.66556$M31.1506620@twister.tampabay.rr.com> <9ulosvsc42k3u5rupliljhpasuhd0it31e@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!cyclone.southeast.rr.com!news-post.tampabay.rr.com!twister.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Jason <badmonkeyREMOVE@BANANAScfl.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.games.x-com
Subject: Re: WHAT ?
References: <GIhxb.19$SN1.21147@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net> <C0txb.292556$pT1.14204@twister.nyc.rr.com> <jlddsvge2tj86j02vv5mfpsoi8iqcoar3h@4ax.com> <f0Dxb.2495$O42.991906@newsfep2-win.server.ntli.net> <139esvco2rkl5qhreme9eninco9va4iqem@4ax.com> <54dyb.66556$M31.1506620@twister.tampabay.rr.com> <9ulosvsc42k3u5rupliljhpasuhd0it31e@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <9ulosvsc42k3u5rupliljhpasuhd0it31e@4ax.com>
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <SE3zb.478$AM3.54129@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:06:58 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.33.60.24
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
X-Trace: twister.tampabay.rr.com 1070384818 65.33.60.24 (Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:06:58 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:06:58 EST
Organization: RoadRunner - Central Florida
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit